||5 years ago|
|README.md||5 years ago|
How to Disable WebAssembly (WASM)
WebAssembly increases the attack surface of any browser that supports it. In security engineering, countermeasures are typically employed to reduce risk to potential threats. Here are a few concerning aspects of WebAssembly:
- Web server sends WASM modules to browser in binary format
- WebAssembly execution relies on browser sandboxing for safety
- Transmission and execution does not require TLS, HSTS, or any other transport layer security mechanism
- Integrity checking is not possible as WASM modules are not required to be signed by their author
- A primary WebAssembly goal is to: provide developers with useful primitives and mitigations for developing safe applications.
Based on the above facts, here are some potential threats in using browsers that support WebAssembly:
- Static code analysis becomes increasingly difficult as source code may not be available
- Sandboxing is prone to breakouts and effectiveness varies largely by implementation. Adobe Flash is an example of a technology that was sandboxed after a series of exploits, yet exploits and breakouts still occurred.
- Transmitting a binary executable format over an insecure channel is susceptible to man-in-the-middle attack.
- Code signing, the process of verifying software has not been tampered with, is not currently possible with WASM. WASM is selling itself as the ability to run desktop-like applications in the browser, yet the operating systems it supports all have code signing requirements for installed software. Allowing random drive-by software to execute unsigned seems to be a 'feature' of WebAssembly.
- WebAssembly assumes that 'safe applications' can be derived from language subsets and a few rules to prevent specific type of behavior. This is similar to blacklisting in the security world, a technique that rarely works. The specification omits the possibility of misuse cases from their security dialog. Exploits can occur in 'safe applications' simply by using the application in a way it wasn't designed to run. Since static code analysis is not currently possible, automatically identifying potential performance, insider-threats, security, and misuse cases is not possible.
Unknown. I do not use Windows so if someone knows the answer to this, please submit a pull request.
Chrome must be launched with the following command-line argument:
--js-flags=--noexpose_wasm. On Windows and Linux/Unix, simply appending the argument after the chrome executable is all that's required. For example:
On macOS, the syntax is a bit different.
open /Applications/Google\ Chrome.app --args --js-flags=--noexpose_wasm
On Windows, modifying the registry may also be beneficial in order to maintain state between Chrome auto-updates.
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\ChromeHTML\shell\open\command HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\http\shell\open\command HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\https\shell\open\command
Uncheck the write permission on these keys so that the changes persist on next auto-update of Chrome. Thanks to @tophf for providing information about the flag and registry settings.
The Brave browser (Laptop edition) is based on Chromium and the same command-line argument works on Brave as well.
Safari does not have advanced about:config functionality and the Developer mode does not have an option to disable WASM. If someone knows how to disable in Safari, please submit a pull request.