5140: Fix workload inversion r=dureuill a=ManyTheFish
The used assets were inverted between `workloads/hackernews-modify-facet-numbers.json`
and `workloads/hackernews-modify-facet-strings.json`, now fixed.
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
5300: Improve unexpected panic message r=irevoire a=irevoire
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Fixes https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/5273
## What does this PR do?
- When an unexpected panic happens in the index-scheduler we catch it and rebuild an error message from the join_error
- Same when the upgrade index-scheduler fails
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
5177: Debug log the channel congestion r=Kerollmops a=Kerollmops
This PR displays the congestion of the BBQueue channel and the allocated memory for the channel and the extraction. This information can be beneficial for debugging and noticing slow disks. We show three pieces of information in debug:
- The direct attempts: the number of tries to send something in the BBQueue channel,
- The blocked attempts: the number of unsuccessful attempts that must be retried,
- The congestion: The percentage of blocking attempts. The higher, the slower the receiver and, therefore, the disk.
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
5272: Fix Batches Deletion and flaky tests r=irevoire a=Kerollmops
- This issue fixes#5263 by removing the batches from the date and time databases.
- It also introduces a new `enqueued_at` field in the batch object to quickly retrieve them in the `batches.enqueued_at` database
- Finally, it probably fixes all the flaky tests of the batches: https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/5256
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
5289: Fix workload files after removing the vectorStore experimental feature r=Kerollmops a=dureuill
Running the bench [currently fails](https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/actions/runs/12990029453) on embedding-related workloads, due to the call to `/experimental-features` that is used to enable the vector store:
In v1.13, `vectorStore` is no longer an experimental feature, so trying to enable it causes a 400
Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
5210: Improve test performance of get_index.rs r=irevoire a=DerTimonius
# Pull Request
## Related issue
related to #4840
## What does this PR do?
This PR aims to improve the performance of the tests in `get_index.rs`.
There is a small issue though:
the `list_multiple_indexes` test works great when ran alone, but when running with other tests it fails with a `corrupted task queue` error. I guess this has something to do with using a shared server, but I was not really able to pinpoint the issue.
Also, the `no_index_return_empty_list` does not work a shared server (as there now will always be at least one index on the server) and I was not really sure if rebuilding the whole suite for `get_and_paginate_indexes` should be viable? While waiting for feedback on the issue mentioned above, I'll try to change the `get_and_paginate_indexes` test so that it can use the shared server
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!
Co-authored-by: Timon Jurschitsch <timon.jurschitsch@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Timon Jurschitsch <103483059+DerTimonius@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
5284: Fix [5281] Removed CouldNotUpgrade from error file r=irevoire a=manojks1999
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Fixes#5281
## What does this PR do?
- ...
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [ * ] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [ * ] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [ * ] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Co-authored-by: manojks1999 <9743manoj@gmail.com>
