535: Reintroduce the max values by facet limit r=ManyTheFish a=Kerollmops
This PR reintroduces the max values by facet limit this is related to https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/2349.
~I would like some help in deciding on whether I keep the default 100 max values in milli and set up the `FacetDistribution` settings in Meilisearch to use 1000 as the new value, I expose the `max_values_by_facet` for this purpose.~
I changed the default value to 1000 and the max to 10000, thank you `@ManyTheFish` for the help!
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
538: speedup exact words r=Kerollmops a=MarinPostma
This PR make `exact_words` return an `Option` instead of an empty set, since set creation is costly, as noticed by `@kerollmops.`
I was not convinces that this was the cause for all of the performance drop we measured, and then realized that methods that initialized it were called recursively which caused initialization times to add up. While the first fix solves the issue when not using exact words, using exact word remained way more expensive that it should be. To address this issue, the exact words are cached into the `Context`, so they are only initialized once.
Co-authored-by: ad hoc <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
525: Simplify the error creation with thiserror r=irevoire a=irevoire
I introduced [`thiserror`](https://docs.rs/thiserror/latest/thiserror/) to implements all the `Display` trait and most of the `impl From<xxx> for yyy` in way less lines.
And then I introduced a cute macro to implements the `impl<X, Y, Z> From<X> for Z where Y: From<X>, Z: From<X>` more easily.
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
523: Improve geosearch error messages r=irevoire a=irevoire
Improve the geosearch error messages (#488).
And try to parse the string as specified in https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/2354
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
520: fix mistake in Settings initialization r=irevoire a=MarinPostma
fix settings not being correctly initialized and add a test to make sure that they are in the future.
fix https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/2358
Co-authored-by: ad hoc <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
518: Return facets even when there is no value associated to it r=Kerollmops a=Kerollmops
This PR is related to https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/2352 and should fix the issue when Meilisearch is up-to-date with this PR.
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
511: Update version in every workspace r=curquiza a=curquiza
Checked with `@Kerollmops`
- Update the version into every workspace (the current version is v0.27.0, but I forgot to update it for the previous release)
- add `publish = false` except in `milli` workspace.
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar <clementine@meilisearch.com>
514: Stop flattening every field r=Kerollmops a=irevoire
When we need to flatten a document:
* The primary key contains a `.`.
* Some fields need to be flattened
Instead of flattening the whole object and thus creating a lot of allocations with the `serde_json_flatten_crate`, we instead generate a minimal sub-object containing only the fields that need to be flattened.
That should create fewer allocations and thus index faster.
---------
```
group indexing_main_e1e362fa indexing_stop-flattening-every-field_40d1bd6b
----- ---------------------- ---------------------------------------------
indexing/Indexing geo_point 1.99 23.7±0.23s ? ?/sec 1.00 11.9±0.21s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing movies in three batches 1.00 18.2±0.24s ? ?/sec 1.01 18.3±0.29s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing movies with default settings 1.00 17.5±0.09s ? ?/sec 1.01 17.7±0.26s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs in three batches with default settings 1.00 64.8±0.47s ? ?/sec 1.00 65.1±0.49s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs with default settings 1.00 54.9±0.99s ? ?/sec 1.01 55.7±1.34s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs without any facets 1.00 50.6±0.62s ? ?/sec 1.01 50.9±1.05s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs without faceted numbers 1.00 54.0±1.14s ? ?/sec 1.01 54.7±1.13s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing wiki 1.00 996.2±8.54s ? ?/sec 1.02 1021.1±30.63s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing wiki in three batches 1.00 1136.8±9.72s ? ?/sec 1.00 1138.6±6.59s ? ?/sec
```
So basically everything slowed down a liiiiiittle bit except the dataset with a nested field which got twice faster
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
505: normalize exact words r=curquiza a=MarinPostma
Normalize the exact words, as specified in the specification.
Co-authored-by: ad hoc <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
483: Enhance matching words r=Kerollmops a=ManyTheFish
# Summary
Enhance milli word-matcher making it handle match computing and cropping.
# Implementation
## Computing best matches for cropping
Before we were considering that the first match of the attribute was the best one, this was accurate when only one word was searched but was missing the target when more than one word was searched.
Now we are searching for the best matches interval to crop around, the chosen interval is the one:
1) that have the highest count of unique matches
> for example, if we have a query `split the world`, then the interval `the split the split the` has 5 matches but only 2 unique matches (1 for `split` and 1 for `the`) where the interval `split of the world` has 3 matches and 3 unique matches. So the interval `split of the world` is considered better.
2) that have the minimum distance between matches
> for example, if we have a query `split the world`, then the interval `split of the world` has a distance of 3 (2 between `split` and `the`, and 1 between `the` and `world`) where the interval `split the world` has a distance of 2. So the interval `split the world` is considered better.
3) that have the highest count of ordered matches
> for example, if we have a query `split the world`, then the interval `the world split` has 2 ordered words where the interval `split the world` has 3. So the interval `split the world` is considered better.
## Cropping around the best matches interval
Before we were cropping around the interval without checking the context.
Now we are cropping around words in the same context as matching words.
This means that we will keep words that are farther from the matching words but are in the same phrase, than words that are nearer but separated by a dot.
> For instance, for the matching word `Split` the text:
`Natalie risk her future. Split The World is a book written by Emily Henry. I never read it.`
will be cropped like:
`…. Split The World is a book written by Emily Henry. …`
and not like:
`Natalie risk her future. Split The World is a book …`
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
We need to store all the external id (primary key) in a hashmap
associated to their internal id during.
The smartstring remove heap allocation / memory usage and should
improve the cache locality.
486: Update version (v0.25.0) r=curquiza a=curquiza
v0.25.0 will be released once #478 is merged
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar <clementine@meilisearch.com>
472: Remove useless variables in proximity r=Kerollmops a=ManyTheFish
Was passing by plane sweep algorithm to find some inspiration, and I discover that we have useless variables that were not detected because of the recursive function.
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
466: Bump version to 0.23.1 r=curquiza a=Kerollmops
This PR bumps the crate versions to 0.23.1. Nothing seems to be breaking in the next release.
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
467: optimize prefix database r=Kerollmops a=MarinPostma
This pr introduces two optimizations that greatly improve the speed of computing prefix databases.
- The time that it takes to create the prefix FST has been divided by 5 by inverting the way we iterated over the words FST.
- We unconditionally and needlessly checked for documents to remove in `word_prefix_pair`, which caused an iteration over the whole database.
Co-authored-by: ad hoc <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
> "Attribute `{}` is not sortable. This index doesn't have configured sortable attributes."
> "Attribute `{}` is not sortable. Available sortable attributes are: `{}`."
coexist in the error handling
436: Speed up the word prefix databases computation time r=Kerollmops a=Kerollmops
This PR depends on the fixes done in #431 and must be merged after it.
In this PR we will bring the `WordPrefixPairProximityDocids`, `WordPrefixDocids` and, `WordPrefixPositionDocids` update structures to a new era, a better era, where computing the word prefix pair proximities costs much fewer CPU cycles, an era where this update structure can use the, previously computed, set of new word docids from the newly indexed batch of documents.
---
The `WordPrefixPairProximityDocids` is an update structure, which means that it is an object that we feed with some parameters and which modifies the LMDB database of an index when asked for. This structure specifically computes the list of word prefix pair proximities, which correspond to a list of pairs of words associated with a proximity (the distance between both words) where the second word is not a word but a prefix e.g. `s`, `se`, `a`. This word prefix pair proximity is associated with the list of documents ids which contains the pair of words and prefix at the given proximity.
The origin of the performances issue that this struct brings is related to the fact that it starts its job from the beginning, it clears the LMDB database before rewriting everything from scratch, using the other LMDB databases to achieve that. I hope you understand that this is absolutely not an optimized way of doing things.
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
442: fix phrase search r=curquiza a=MarinPostma
Run the exact match search on 7 words windows instead of only two. This makes false positive very very unlikely, and impossible on phrase query that are less than seven words.
Co-authored-by: ad hoc <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
431: Fix and improve word prefix pair proximity r=ManyTheFish a=Kerollmops
This PR first fixes the algorithm we used to select and compute the word prefix pair proximity database. The previous version was skipping nearly all of the prefixes. The issue is that this fix made this method to take more time and we were trying to reduce the time spent in it.
With `@ManyTheFish` we found out that we could skip some of the work we were doing by:
- discarding the prefixes that were shorter than a specific threshold (default: 2).
- discarding the word prefix pairs with proximity bigger than a specific threshold (default: 4).
- remove the unused threshold that was specifying a minimum amount of word docids to merge.
We will take more time to do some more optimization, like stop clearing and recomputing from scratch the database, we will compute the subsets of keys to create, keep and merge. This change is a little bit more complex than what this PR does.
I keep this PR as a draft as I want to further test the real gain if it is enough or not if it is valid or not. I advise reviewers to review commit by commit to see the changes bit by bit, reviewing the whole PR can be hard.
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
433: fix(filter): Fix two bugs. r=Kerollmops a=irevoire
- Stop lowercasing the field when looking in the field id map
- When a field id does not exist it means there is currently zero
documents containing this field thus we return an empty RoaringBitmap
instead of throwing an internal error
Will fix https://github.com/meilisearch/MeiliSearch/issues/2082 once meilisearch is released
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
426: Fix search highlight for non-unicode chars r=ManyTheFish a=Samyak2
# Pull Request
## What does this PR do?
Fixes https://github.com/meilisearch/MeiliSearch/issues/1480
<!-- Please link the issue you're trying to fix with this PR, if none then please create an issue first. -->
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
## Changes
The `matching_bytes` function takes a `&Token` now and:
- gets the number of bytes to highlight (unchanged).
- uses `Token.num_graphemes_from_bytes` to get the number of grapheme clusters to highlight.
In essence, the `matching_bytes` function now returns the number of matching grapheme clusters instead of bytes.
Added proper highlighting in the HTTP UI:
- requires dependency on `unicode-segmentation` to extract grapheme clusters from tokens
- `<mark>` tag is put around only the matched part
- before this change, the entire word was highlighted even if only a part of it matched
## Questions
Since `matching_bytes` does not return number of bytes but grapheme clusters, should it be renamed to something like `matching_chars` or `matching_graphemes`? Will this break the API?
Thank you very much `@ManyTheFish` for helping 😄
Co-authored-by: Samyak S Sarnayak <samyak201@gmail.com>
- Stop lowercasing the field when looking in the field id map
- When a field id does not exist it means there is currently zero
documents containing this field thus we returns an empty RoaringBitmap
instead of throwing an internal error
The `matching_bytes` function takes a `&Token` now and:
- gets the number of bytes to highlight (unchanged).
- uses `Token.num_graphemes_from_bytes` to get the number of grapheme
clusters to highlight.
In essence, the `matching_bytes` function returns the number of matching
grapheme clusters instead of bytes. Should this function be renamed
then?
Added proper highlighting in the HTTP UI:
- requires dependency on `unicode-segmentation` to extract grapheme
clusters from tokens
- `<mark>` tag is put around only the matched part
- before this change, the entire word was highlighted even if only a
part of it matched
returned metaimprove document addition returned metaimprove document
addition returned metaimprove document addition returned metaimprove
document addition returned metaimprove document addition returned
metaimprove document addition returned meta
407: Update version for the next release (v0.20.0) r=curquiza a=curquiza
Breaking because of #405 and #406
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar <clementine@meilisearch.com>
