2057: fix(dump): Uncompress the dump IN the data.ms r=irevoire a=irevoire
When loading a dump with docker, we had two problems.
After creating a tempdirectory, uncompressing and re-indexing the dump:
1. We try to `move` the new “data.ms” onto the currently present
one. The problem is that if the `data.ms` is a mount point because
that's what peoples do with docker usually. We can't override
a mount point, and thus we were throwing an error.
2. The tempdir is created in `/tmp`, which is usually quite small AND may not
be on the same partition as the `data.ms`. This means when we tried to move
the dump over the `data.ms`, it was also failing because we can't move data
between two partitions.
------------------
1 was fixed by deleting the *content* of the `data.ms` and moving the *content*
of the tempdir *inside* the `data.ms`. If someone tries to create volumes inside
the `data.ms` that's his problem, not ours.
2 was fixed by creating the tempdir *inside* of the `data.ms`. If a user mounted
its `data.ms` on a large partition, there is no reason he could not load a big
dump because his `/tmp` was too small. This solves the issue; now the dump is
extracted and indexed on the same partition the `data.ms` will lay.
fix#1833
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
When loading a dump with docker, we had two problems.
After creating a tempdirectory, uncompressing and re-indexing the dump:
1. We try to `move` the new “data.ms” onto the currently present
one. The problem is that if the `data.ms` is a mount point because
that's what peoples do with docker usually. We can't override
a mount point, and thus we were throwing an error.
2. The tempdir is created in `/tmp`, which is usually quite small AND may not
be on the same partition as the `data.ms`. This means when we tried to move
the dump over the `data.ms`, it was also failing because we can't move data
between two partitions.
==============
1 was fixed by deleting the *content* of the `data.ms` and moving the *content*
of the tempdir *inside* the `data.ms`. If someone tries to create volumes inside
the `data.ms` that's his problem, not ours.
2 was fixed by creating the tempdir *inside* of the `data.ms`. If a user mounted
its `data.ms` on a large partition, there is no reason he could not load a big
dump because his `/tmp` was too small. This solves the issue; now the dump is
extracted and indexed on the same partition the `data.ms` will lay.
fix#1833
2008: bug(lib): fix get dumps bad error code r=curquiza a=MarinPostma
fix bad error code being returned whet getting a dump status, and add a test
close#1994
Co-authored-by: Marin Postma <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
- Add API keys in snapshots
- Add API keys in dumps
- Rename action indexes.add to indexes.create
- fix QA #1979fix#1979fix#1995fix#2001fix#2003
related to #1890
1965: Reintroduce engine version file r=MarinPostma a=irevoire
Right now if you boot up MeiliSearch and point it to a DB directory created with a previous version of MeiliSearch the existing indexes will be deleted. This [used to be](51d7c84e73) prevented by a startup check which would compare the current engine version vs what was stored in the DB directory's version file, but this functionality seems to have been lost after a few refactorings of the code.
In order to go back to the old behavior we'll need to reintroduce the `VERSION` file that used to be present; I considered reusing the `metadata.json` file used in the dumps feature, but this seemed like the simpler and more approach. As the intent is just to restore functionality, the implementation is quite basic. I imagine that in the future we could build on this and do things like compatibility across major/minor versions and even migrating between formats.
This PR was made thanks to `@mbStavola` and is basically a port of his PR #1860 after a big refacto of the code #1796.
Closes#1840
Co-authored-by: Matt Stavola <m.freitas@offensive-security.com>
Right now if you boot up MeiliSearch and point it to a DB directory created with a previous version of MeiliSearch the existing indexes will be deleted. This used to be prevented by a startup check which would compare the current engine version vs what was stored in the DB directory's version file, but this functionality seems to have been lost after a few refactorings of the code.
In order to go back to the old behavior we'll need to reintroduce the VERSION file that used to be present; I considered reusing the metadata.json file used in the dumps feature, but this seemed like the simpler and more approach. As the intent is just to restore functionality, the implementation is quite basic. I imagine that in the future we could build on this and do things like compatibility across major/minor versions and even migrating between formats.
This PR was made thanks to @mbStavola
Closes#1840
implements:
https://github.com/meilisearch/specifications/blob/develop/text/0085-api-keys.md
- Add tests on API keys management route (meilisearch-http/tests/auth/api_keys.rs)
- Add tests checking authorizations on each meilisearch routes (meilisearch-http/tests/auth/authorization.rs)
- Implement API keys management routes (meilisearch-http/src/routes/api_key.rs)
- Create module to manage API keys and authorizations (meilisearch-auth)
- Reimplement GuardedData to extend authorizations (meilisearch-http/src/extractors/authentication/mod.rs)
- Change X-MEILI-API-KEY by Authorization Bearer (meilisearch-http/src/extractors/authentication/mod.rs)
- Change meilisearch routes to fit to the new authorization feature (meilisearch-http/src/routes/)
- close#1867
1893: Make matches work with numerical value r=MarinPostma a=Thearas
# Pull Request
## What does this PR do?
Implement #1883.
I have test this PR with unit test. It appears to be working properly:
PTAL `@curquiza`
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Co-authored-by: Thearas <thearas850@gmail.com>
1813: Apply highlight tags on numbers in the formatted search result output r=irevoire a=Jhnbrn90
This is my first ever Rust related PR.
As described in #1758, I've attempted to highlighting numbers correctly under the `_formatted` key.
Additionally, I added a test which should assert appropriate highlighting.
I'm open to suggestions and improvements.
Co-authored-by: John Braun <john@brn.email>
1763: Index tests r=MarinPostma a=MarinPostma
This pr aims to test more thorougly the usage on index in the meilisearch database, by writing unit tests.
work included:
- [x] Create index mock and stub methods
- [x] Test snapshot creation
- [x] Test Dumps
- [x] Test search
Co-authored-by: mpostma <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
