461: Add a new error message when the `valid_fields` is empty r=curquiza a=brunoocasali
I've created a test case to handle the new error formatting behavior, but I'm not sure if:
- this is the right place to add the test?
- this is the best way to test this behavior?
And I'm not sure also regarding the `match` implementation, is this something required? Or maybe just an `if` statement is ok as well?
I left the two messages literally without "reusing the prefix" in the implementation because I think this could help the "searchability" of the error in the future.
# Pull Request
## What does this PR do?
Fixes https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/2140
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue?
- [ ] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!
Co-authored-by: Bruno Casali <brunoocasali@gmail.com>
2204: Fix blocking auth r=Kerollmops a=MarinPostma
Fix auth blocking runtime
I have decided to remove async code from `meilisearch-auth` and let `meilisearch-http` handle that.
Because Actix polls the extractor futures concurrently, I have made a wrapper extractor that forces the errors from the futures to be returned sequentially (though is still polls them sequentially).
close#2201
Co-authored-by: ad hoc <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
462: cli improvements r=Kerollmops a=MarinPostma
a few improvements:
- use bufreader to load documents, so the loading of the document doesn't appear on flamegraphs
- set default db path to current directory so the `-i` flag can be omitted.
Co-authored-by: ad hoc <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
> "Attribute `{}` is not sortable. This index doesn't have configured sortable attributes."
> "Attribute `{}` is not sortable. Available sortable attributes are: `{}`."
coexist in the error handling
459: Update heed link in cargo toml r=Kerollmops a=curquiza
Since grenad and heed have been moved to the meilisearch orga, this PR changes the link.
This is a minor change since GitHub handles automatically the redirection. This PR is only for consisitency.
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar <clementine@meilisearch.com>
456: Remove useless grenad merging r=Kerollmops a=Kerollmops
This PR must be merged after #454.
This PR removes the part of code that was merging all of the grenad Readers merging that we don't need as the indexer should have merged them and, therefore, we should only have one final grenad Reader. We reduce the amount of CPU usage and memory pressure we were doing uselessly.
`@ManyTheFish` are you sure I can skip merging the `word_docids` database?
Here is the benchmark comparison with the previously merged PR #454:
```
group indexing_reintroduce-appending-sorted-values_c05e42a8 indexing_remove-useless-grenad-merging_d5b8b5a2
----- ----------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
indexing/Indexing movies with default settings 1.06 16.6±1.04s ? ?/sec 1.00 15.7±0.93s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs with default settings 1.16 60.1±7.07s ? ?/sec 1.00 51.7±5.98s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs without faceted numbers 1.06 55.4±6.14s ? ?/sec 1.00 52.2±4.13s ? ?/sec
```
And the comparison with multi-batch indexing before #436, we can see that we gain time for benchmarks that index datasets in multiple batches but there is _so much_ variance that it's not clear.
```
group indexing_benchmark-multi-batch-indexing-before-speed-up_45f52620 indexing_remove-useless-grenad-merging_d5b8b5a2
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
indexing/Indexing geo_point 1.07 6.6±0.08s ? ?/sec 1.00 6.2±0.11s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs in three batches with default settings 1.12 57.7±2.14s ? ?/sec 1.00 51.5±3.80s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs with default settings 1.00 47.5±2.52s ? ?/sec 1.09 51.7±5.98s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs without any facets 1.00 43.5±1.43s ? ?/sec 1.12 48.8±3.73s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs without faceted numbers 1.00 47.1±2.23s ? ?/sec 1.11 52.2±4.13s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing wiki 1.00 917.3±30.01s ? ?/sec 1.09 998.7±38.92s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing wiki in three batches 1.09 1091.2±32.73s ? ?/sec 1.00 996.5±15.70s ? ?/sec
```
What do you think `@irevoire?` Should we change the benchmarks to make them do more runs?
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
2197: Additions to 0.26 (Update actix-web dependency to 4.0) r=curquiza a=MarinPostma
- `@robjtede`
`@MarinPostma`
[update actix-web dependency to 4.0](3b2e467ca6)
From main to release-v0.26.0
Co-authored-by: Rob Ede <robjtede@icloud.com>
2194: update actix-web dependency to 4.0 r=irevoire a=robjtede
# Pull Request
## What does this PR do?
Updates Actix Web ecosystem crates to 4.0 stable.
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] ~~Does this PR fix an existing issue?~~
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Co-authored-by: Rob Ede <robjtede@icloud.com>
454: Reintroduce appending sorted entries when possible r=Kerollmops a=Kerollmops
This PR modifies the `sorter_into_lmdb_database` function to append values into the database instead of get-put-merging them, it should improve the indexation speed for when the database is empty.
```txt
group indexing_main_25123af3 indexing_reintroduce-appending-sorted-values_c05e42a8
----- ---------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
indexing/Indexing movies with default settings 1.07 17.8±0.99s ? ?/sec 1.00 16.6±1.04s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs with default settings 1.00 57.0±6.01s ? ?/sec 1.05 60.1±7.07s ? ?/sec
indexing/Indexing songs without any facets 1.10 51.8±5.36s ? ?/sec 1.00 47.3±3.30s ? ?/sec
```
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
453: Benchmark multi batch indexing r=Kerollmops a=Kerollmops
Hey `@irevoire,` could you please add the new benchmarks into influx?
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
2192: Fix max dbs error r=Kerollmops a=MarinPostma
Factor the way we open environments to make sure they are always opened with the same options.
The issue was that indexes were first opened in snapshots with incorrect options, and heed cache returned an environment with incorrect open options on subsequent index open.
fix#2190
Co-authored-by: ad hoc <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
