290 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tamo
11e394dba1
merge the document fetch and get error codes 2023-05-04 15:39:49 +02:00
Tamo
469d2f2a9c
fix the fields field of the POST fetch document API 2023-05-04 15:34:09 +02:00
Tamo
ce6507d20c
improve the test of the get document by filter 2023-05-04 15:34:09 +02:00
Tamo
b92da5d15a
add a big test on the get document by filter of the get route 2023-05-04 15:34:09 +02:00
Tamo
ed3dfbe729
add error codes and tests 2023-05-04 15:34:08 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
441641397b
Implement document get with filters 2023-05-04 15:32:34 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
745c1a2668
Make parse_filter pub 2023-05-04 15:31:53 +02:00
meili-bors[bot]
a95128df6b
Merge #3550
3550: Delete documents by filter r=irevoire a=dureuill

# Prototype `prototype-delete-by-filter-0`

Usage:
A new route is available under `POST /indexes/{index_uid}/documents/delete` that allows you to delete your documents by filter.
The expected payload looks like that:
```json
{
  "filter": "doggo = bernese",
}
```

It'll then enqueue a task in your task queue that'll delete all the documents matching this filter once it's processed.
Here is an example of the associated details;
```json
  "details": {
    "deletedDocuments": 53,
    "originalFilter": "\"doggo = bernese\""
  }
```

----------


# Pull Request

## Related issue
Related to https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3477

## What does this PR do?

### User standpoint

- Modifies the `/indexes/{:indexUid}/documents/delete-batch` route to accept either the existing array of documents ids, or a JSON object with a `filter` field representing a filter to apply. If that latter variant is used, any document matching the filter will be deleted.

### Implementation standpoint

- (processing time version) Adds a new BatchKind that is not autobatchable and that performs the delete by filter
- Reuse the `documentDeletion` task with a new `originalFilter` detail that replaces the `providedIds` detail.

## Example

<details>
<summary>Sample request, response and task result</summary>

Request:

```
curl \
  -X POST 'http://localhost:7700/indexes/index-10/documents/delete-batch' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data-binary '{ "filter" : "mass = 600"}'
```

Response:

```
{
  "taskUid": 3902,
  "indexUid": "index-10",
  "status": "enqueued",
  "type": "documentDeletion",
  "enqueuedAt": "2023-02-28T20:50:31.667502Z"
}
```

Task log:

```json
    {
      "uid": 3906,
      "indexUid": "index-12",
      "status": "succeeded",
      "type": "documentDeletion",
      "canceledBy": null,
      "details": {
        "deletedDocuments": 3,
        "originalFilter": "\"mass = 600\""
      },
      "error": null,
      "duration": "PT0.001819S",
      "enqueuedAt": "2023-03-07T08:57:20.11387Z",
      "startedAt": "2023-03-07T08:57:20.115895Z",
      "finishedAt": "2023-03-07T08:57:20.117714Z"
    }
```

</details>

## Draft status

- [ ] Error handling
- [ ] Analytics
- [ ] Do we want to reuse the `delete-batch` route in this way, or create a new route instead?
- [ ] Should the filter be applied at request time or when the deletion task is processed? 
  - The first commit in this PR applies the filter at request time, meaning that even if a document is modified in a way that no longer matches the filter in a later update, it will be deleted as long as the deletion task is processed after that update. 
  - The other commits in this PR apply the filter only when the asynchronous deletion task is processed, meaning that documents that match the filter at processing time are deleted even if they didn't match the filter at request time.
- [ ] If keeping the filter at request time, find a more elegant way to recover the user document ids from the internal document ids. The current way implemented in the first commit of this PR involves getting all the documents matching the filter, looking for the value of their primary key, and turning it into a string by copy-pasting routines found in milli...
- [ ] Security consideration, if any
- [ ] Fix the tests (but waiting until product questions are resolved)
- [ ] Add delete by filter specific tests



Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
2023-05-04 10:44:41 +00:00
meili-bors[bot]
e0537c3870
Merge #3720
3720: Change links of docs everywhere r=curquiza a=curquiza

Completely fixes #3668 

Co-authored-by: curquiza <clementine@meilisearch.com>
2023-05-04 10:07:41 +00:00
Tamo
aa7537a11e
make the autodeletion work with a fixed number of tasks and update the tests 2023-05-04 00:06:49 +02:00
Tamo
f9ddd32545
implement the auto-deletion of tasks 2023-05-04 00:06:49 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
d5059520aa
Fix typo 2023-05-03 22:27:03 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
1c3642c9b2
Fix deletion per filter analytics 2023-05-03 22:26:51 +02:00
Tamo
d2d2bacaf2
add a test on the complex filter 2023-05-03 20:07:08 +02:00
curquiza
30edba3497 Update links of the docs 2023-05-03 19:14:57 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
84e7bd9342
Fix test after rebase on filter additions 2023-05-03 17:51:28 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
2b74e4d116
Fix test 2023-05-03 17:41:50 +02:00
Tamo
b5fe0b2b07
fix the details 2023-05-03 17:41:50 +02:00
Tamo
fc8c1d118d
fix the analytics 2023-05-03 17:41:50 +02:00
Tamo
0548ab9038
create and use the error code 2023-05-03 17:41:50 +02:00
Tamo
143acb9cdc
update the tests 2023-05-03 17:41:49 +02:00
Tamo
4b92f1b269
wip 2023-05-03 17:41:49 +02:00
Tamo
c12a1cd956
test all the error messages 2023-05-03 17:41:49 +02:00
Tamo
8af8aa5a33
add a test 2023-05-03 17:41:49 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
732c52093d
Processing time without autobatching implementation 2023-05-03 17:41:48 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
05cc463fbc
Draft implementation of filter support for /delete-by-batch route 2023-05-03 17:41:48 +02:00
meili-bors[bot]
c0e081cd98
Merge #3702 #3710
3702: Update charabia v0.7.2 r=curquiza a=ManyTheFish

fixes #3701
fixes #3689
fixes #3285 

3710: Updated messages pointing to the docs website r=curquiza a=roy9495

# Pull Request

Fixes partially #3668

## What does this PR do?
- ...Any messages referencing this docs site https://docs.meilisearch.com has been changed to this docs site https://meilisearch.com/docs .
 Thanks.

## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?

Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!


Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: TATHAGATA ROY <98920199+roy9495@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-02 17:27:57 +00:00
TATHAGATA ROY
feaf25a95d Updated messages pointing to the docs website 2023-04-28 20:52:03 +00:00
bors[bot]
414b3fae89
Merge #3571
3571: Introduce two filters to select documents with `null` and empty fields r=irevoire a=Kerollmops

# Pull Request

## Related issue
This PR implements the `X IS NULL`, `X IS NOT NULL`, `X IS EMPTY`, `X IS NOT EMPTY` filters that [this comment](https://github.com/meilisearch/product/discussions/539#discussioncomment-5115884) is describing in a very detailed manner.

## What does this PR do?

### `IS NULL` and `IS NOT NULL`

This PR will be exposed as a prototype for now. Below is the copy/pasted version of a spec that defines this filter.

- `IS NULL` matches fields that `EXISTS` AND `= IS NULL`
- `IS NOT NULL` matches fields that `NOT EXISTS` OR `!= IS NULL`

1. `{"name": "A", "price": null}`
2. `{"name": "A", "price": 10}`
3. `{"name": "A"}`

`price IS NULL` would match 1
`price IS NOT NULL` or `NOT price IS NULL` would match 2,3
`price EXISTS` would match 1, 2
`price NOT EXISTS` or `NOT price EXISTS` would match 3

common query : `(price EXISTS) AND (price IS NOT NULL)` would match 2

### `IS EMPTY` and `IS NOT EMPTY`

- `IS EMPTY` matches Array `[]`, Object `{}`, or String `""` fields that `EXISTS` and are empty
- `IS NOT EMPTY` matches fields that `NOT EXISTS` OR are not empty.

1. `{"name": "A", "tags": null}`
2. `{"name": "A", "tags": [null]}`
3. `{"name": "A", "tags": []}`
4. `{"name": "A", "tags": ["hello","world"]}`
5. `{"name": "A", "tags": [""]}`
6. `{"name": "A"}`
7. `{"name": "A", "tags": {}}`
8. `{"name": "A", "tags": {"t1":"v1"}}`
9. `{"name": "A", "tags": {"t1":""}}`
10. `{"name": "A", "tags": ""}`

`tags IS EMPTY` would match 3,7,10
`tags IS NOT EMPTY` or `NOT tags IS EMPTY` would match 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
`tags IS NULL` would match 1
`tags IS NOT NULL` or `NOT tags IS NULL` would match 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
`tags EXISTS` would match 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10
`tags NOT EXISTS` or `NOT tags EXISTS` would match 6

common query : `(tags EXISTS) AND (tags IS NOT NULL) AND (tags IS NOT EMPTY)` would match 2,4,5,8,9

## What should the reviewer do?

- Check that I tested the filters
- Check that I deleted the ids of the documents when deleting documents


Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
2023-04-27 13:14:00 +00:00
ManyTheFish
249053e514 Update feature flags 2023-04-26 14:59:25 +02:00
Clément Renault
cfd1b2cc97
Fix the clippy warnings 2023-04-25 16:40:32 +02:00
Kerollmops
a3cf104736
Fix the compilation 2023-04-24 17:50:58 +02:00
Kerollmops
a109802d45
Upgrade the incompatible versions of the dependencies 2023-04-24 17:50:57 +02:00
Kerollmops
2d8060df80
Fix the tests 2023-04-24 17:50:57 +02:00
Kerollmops
47b66e49b8
Upgrade the compatible versions of the dependencies 2023-04-24 17:50:52 +02:00
bors[bot]
654a3a9e19
Merge #3688
3688: Following release v1.1.1: bring back changes into `main` r=curquiza a=curquiza

`@meilisearch/engine-team` ensure the changes we bring to `main` are the ones you want

Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: bors[bot] <26634292+bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: dureuill <dureuill@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-24 11:38:23 +00:00
Louis Dureuil
c2f4b6ced0
Test: await for the deletion task to complete before trying to add another task 2023-04-13 18:22:42 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
1e6cbcaf12
Update test comment
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
2023-04-13 17:27:12 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
066c6bd875
test task db full now checks that a task can be successfully added after deleting tasks 2023-04-13 17:20:06 +02:00
Tamo
b3f60ee805 try to fix the ci 2023-04-13 10:18:58 +02:00
Tamo
b4fabce36d
update the error message + update the task db size to 20GiB with a limit at 50% 2023-04-12 18:54:11 +02:00
Tamo
9350a7b017
improve the test and try to understand the issue happening on windows 2023-04-12 18:54:11 +02:00
Tamo
be69ab320d
stops receiving tasks once the task queue is full 2023-04-12 18:54:11 +02:00
Tamo
4d308d5237 Improve the health route by ensuring lmdb is not down
And refactorize slightly the auth controller.
2023-04-06 15:31:42 +02:00
bors[bot]
b4c01581cd
Merge #3641
3641: Bring back changes from `release v1.1.0` into `main` after v1.1.0 release r=curquiza a=curquiza

Replace https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/pull/3637 since we don't want to pull commits from `main` into `release-v1.1.0` when fixing git conflicts

Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: bors[bot] <26634292+bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlotte Vermandel <charlottevermandel@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: curquiza <clementine@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Many the fish <many@meilisearch.com>
2023-04-06 12:37:54 +00:00
Tamo
67fd3b08ef wait until all tasks are processed before running our dump integration tests 2023-04-05 18:35:43 +02:00
filip
f267bed352
remove a unnecessary comment
Co-authored-by: Tamo <irevoire@protonmail.ch>
2023-04-05 13:44:55 +02:00
Tamo
597d57bf1d Merge branch 'main' into bring-back-changes-v1.1.0 2023-04-05 11:32:14 +02:00
Filip Bachul
0fba08cd72 fmt 2023-04-03 20:18:26 +02:00
Filip Bachul
189d4c3b70 add geoPoint integration tests 2023-04-03 20:18:26 +02:00