Search for best proximities in multiple attributes

This commit is contained in:
Kerollmops 2020-07-13 18:47:43 +02:00
parent 576dd011a1
commit 3d144e62c4
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 92ADA4E935E71FA4
2 changed files with 60 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ pub fn positions_proximity(lhs: u32, rhs: u32) -> u32 {
} }
// Returns the attribute and index parts. // Returns the attribute and index parts.
fn extract_position(position: u32) -> (u32, u32) { pub fn extract_position(position: u32) -> (u32, u32) {
(position / ONE_ATTRIBUTE, position % ONE_ATTRIBUTE) (position / ONE_ATTRIBUTE, position % ONE_ATTRIBUTE)
} }
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ impl Node {
parent_position: *position, parent_position: *position,
}; };
// We do not produce the nodes we have already seen in previous iterations loops. // We do not produce the nodes we have already seen in previous iterations loops.
if proximity > 7 || (node.is_complete(positions) && acc_proximity + proximity < best_proximity) { if node.is_complete(positions) && acc_proximity + proximity < best_proximity {
None None
} else { } else {
Some((node, proximity)) Some((node, proximity))
@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ impl BestProximity {
{ {
let before = Instant::now(); let before = Instant::now();
if self.best_proximity == self.positions.len() as u32 * (MAX_DISTANCE - 1) { if self.best_proximity == self.positions.len() as u32 * MAX_DISTANCE {
return None; return None;
} }
@ -177,6 +177,11 @@ impl BestProximity {
mod tests { mod tests {
use super::*; use super::*;
fn sort<T: Ord>(mut val: (u32, Vec<T>)) -> (u32, Vec<T>) {
val.1.sort_unstable();
val
}
#[test] #[test]
fn same_attribute() { fn same_attribute() {
let positions = vec![ let positions = vec![
@ -190,7 +195,7 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((1+2, vec![vec![0, 1, 3]]))); // 3 assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((1+2, vec![vec![0, 1, 3]]))); // 3
assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((2+2, vec![vec![2, 1, 3]]))); // 4 assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((2+2, vec![vec![2, 1, 3]]))); // 4
assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((3+2, vec![vec![3, 1, 3]]))); // 5 assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((3+2, vec![vec![3, 1, 3]]))); // 5
assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((1+5, vec![vec![0, 1, 6], vec![4, 1, 3]]))); // 6 assert_eq!(iter.next(f).map(sort), Some((1+5, vec![vec![0, 1, 6], vec![4, 1, 3]]))); // 6
assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((2+5, vec![vec![2, 1, 6]]))); // 7 assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((2+5, vec![vec![2, 1, 6]]))); // 7
assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((3+5, vec![vec![3, 1, 6]]))); // 8 assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((3+5, vec![vec![3, 1, 6]]))); // 8
assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((4+5, vec![vec![4, 1, 6]]))); // 9 assert_eq!(iter.next(f), Some((4+5, vec![vec![4, 1, 6]]))); // 9

View File

@ -198,30 +198,66 @@ impl Index {
union_docids union_docids
}; };
// Returns the union of the same attribute for all the derived words.
let unions_word_attr = |word: usize, attr: u32| {
let mut union_docids = RoaringBitmap::new();
for (word, _) in &words[word] {
let mut key = word.clone();
key.extend_from_slice(&attr.to_be_bytes());
if let Some(right) = self.word_attribute_docids.get(rtxn, &key).unwrap() {
union_docids.union_with(&right);
}
}
union_docids
};
let mut union_cache = HashMap::new(); let mut union_cache = HashMap::new();
let mut intersect_cache = HashMap::new(); let mut intersect_cache = HashMap::new();
let mut attribute_union_cache = HashMap::new();
let mut attribute_intersect_cache = HashMap::new();
// Returns `true` if there is documents in common between the two words and positions given. // Returns `true` if there is documents in common between the two words and positions given.
let mut contains_documents = |(lword, lpos), (rword, rpos), union_cache: &mut HashMap<_, _>, candidates: &RoaringBitmap| { let mut contains_documents = |(lword, lpos), (rword, rpos), union_cache: &mut HashMap<_, _>, candidates: &RoaringBitmap| {
let proximity = best_proximity::positions_proximity(lpos, rpos); if lpos == rpos { return false }
if proximity == 0 { return false } let (lattr, _) = best_proximity::extract_position(lpos);
let (rattr, _) = best_proximity::extract_position(rpos);
// We retrieve or compute the intersection between the two given words and positions. if lattr == rattr {
*intersect_cache.entry(((lword, lpos), (rword, rpos))).or_insert_with(|| { // We retrieve or compute the intersection between the two given words and positions.
// We retrieve or compute the unions for the two words and positions. *intersect_cache.entry(((lword, lpos), (rword, rpos))).or_insert_with(|| {
union_cache.entry((lword, lpos)).or_insert_with(|| unions_word_pos(lword, lpos)); // We retrieve or compute the unions for the two words and positions.
union_cache.entry((rword, rpos)).or_insert_with(|| unions_word_pos(rword, rpos)); union_cache.entry((lword, lpos)).or_insert_with(|| unions_word_pos(lword, lpos));
union_cache.entry((rword, rpos)).or_insert_with(|| unions_word_pos(rword, rpos));
// TODO is there a way to avoid this double gets? // TODO is there a way to avoid this double gets?
let lunion_docids = union_cache.get(&(lword, lpos)).unwrap(); let lunion_docids = union_cache.get(&(lword, lpos)).unwrap();
let runion_docids = union_cache.get(&(rword, rpos)).unwrap(); let runion_docids = union_cache.get(&(rword, rpos)).unwrap();
// We first check that the docids of these unions are part of the candidates. // We first check that the docids of these unions are part of the candidates.
if lunion_docids.is_disjoint(candidates) { return false } if lunion_docids.is_disjoint(candidates) { return false }
if runion_docids.is_disjoint(candidates) { return false } if runion_docids.is_disjoint(candidates) { return false }
!lunion_docids.is_disjoint(&runion_docids) !lunion_docids.is_disjoint(&runion_docids)
}) })
} else {
*attribute_intersect_cache.entry(((lword, lattr), (rword, rattr))).or_insert_with(|| {
// We retrieve or compute the unions for the two words and positions.
attribute_union_cache.entry((lword, lattr)).or_insert_with(|| unions_word_attr(lword, lattr));
attribute_union_cache.entry((rword, rattr)).or_insert_with(|| unions_word_attr(rword, rattr));
// TODO is there a way to avoid this double gets?
let lunion_docids = attribute_union_cache.get(&(lword, lattr)).unwrap();
let runion_docids = attribute_union_cache.get(&(rword, rattr)).unwrap();
// We first check that the docids of these unions are part of the candidates.
if lunion_docids.is_disjoint(candidates) { return false }
if runion_docids.is_disjoint(candidates) { return false }
!lunion_docids.is_disjoint(&runion_docids)
})
}
}; };
let mut documents = Vec::new(); let mut documents = Vec::new();