0
0

Drop the copyright year from all files

I actually copied that strategy from curl:
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2023/01/08/copyright-without-years

Comments below that blog post mention other sources,
disagreeing or agreeing with the kind of strategy propagated:

lawyer propagating the year (re-publishing and own blog):
https://liferay.dev/blogs/-/blogs/how-and-why-to-properly-write-copyright-statements-in-your-code#why-keep-the-year
https://matija.suklje.name/how-and-why-to-properly-write-copyright-statements-in-your-code#why-keep-the-year

linux foundation note about copyright notices w/o years mentioned:
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/blog/copyright-notices-in-open-source-software-projects

To me it seems currently viable to reproduce the date based on the git log,
even signed if necessary.
This commit is contained in:
Nils Freydank 2024-05-05 18:28:43 +02:00
parent 92d133e6db
commit 5aa532bb84
Signed by: nfr
GPG Key ID: 0F1DEAB2D36AD112
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
Copyright 2021 Nils Freydank <nils.freydank@datenschutz-ist-voll-doof.de> Copyright Nils Freydank <nils.freydank@datenschutz-ist-voll-doof.de>
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of
this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in

View File

@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ IRC: holgersson on libera.chat and oftc, mostly in Gentoo related channels
== Copyright == Copyright
The bash script and it's documentation (this README) are licensed as MIT, The bash script and it's documentation (this README) are licensed as MIT,
Copyright 2021 by Nils Freydank. copyright by Nils Freydank.
The used software has each is own license, but is all FLOSS software. The used software has each is own license, but is all FLOSS software.