Fixes#490 which was concerned that the additional resources list did not include all like items, I understand driven by concern that the SPDX license list includes non-open licenses. So does the FSF license list -- worse, it even recommends some.
This fix focuses the list on resources about choosing an open license, not resources listing a bunch of licenses. Fortunately both OSI and FSF have pages directly addressing choosing a license.
I've removed the SPDX and English Wikipedia lists.
Avoid:
```
spec/license_spec.rb:3:1: C: Metrics/BlockLength: Block has too many lines. [40/25]
describe 'licenses' do ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
spec/license_spec.rb:8:3: C: Metrics/BlockLength: Block has too many lines. [35/25]
licenses.each do |license| ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
spec/license_spec.rb:9:5: C: Metrics/BlockLength: Block has too many lines. [33/25]
context "The #{license['title']} license" do ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Doesn't seem worth refactoring, but happy to be wrong.
Seems to be one-time use https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/pull/221 and doesn't need to stick around.
Side note: I wondered what was going on with the double rename. I guess to make work with case insensitive file systems, which I had forgotten about.
- document criteria for whether a license is hidden
- needed for license spectrum on /licenses OR
- on 'popular' list at https://opensource.org/licenses (some other list could be used in the future)
- adjust license properties and tests accordingly
This gets non-hidden list back close to what it was before #386 and (pending licensee vendoring this change, licensee release, and github.com licensee dependency version bump) some commonly requested licenses (eg #413#449) will reappear in the github.com license drop-down.
* same-license is not a limitation and doesn't apply in any way to BSL-1.0
* other licenses with a per-file notice recommendation get that added to the note field
* have the description mention the reason for this license existing, binary distribution without notices (IIUC)
* remove using: pending an example that can be followed by others and detected eg on GitHub, see https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/blob/gh-pages/README.md#optional-fields and see #358#372#377
