1
0
mirror of https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com synced 2024-12-22 12:50:24 +01:00
choosealicense.com/index.html

75 lines
3.2 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

<!DOCTYPE html>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<html lang='en'>
<head>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<title>ChooseALicense.com</title>
<meta charset='utf-8'>
<meta content='IE=edge,chrome=1' http-equiv='X-UA-Compatible'>
<link href='favicon.ico' rel='shortcut icon' type='image/x-icon'>
<link href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Chivo:900' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'>
<link type="text/css" href="css/application.css" media="screen" rel="stylesheet" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="javascripts/modernizr.js"></script>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<!--[if (gte IE 6)&(lte IE 8)]>
<script src='javascripts/selectivizr-min.js' type='text/javascript'></script>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body class='home'>
<div class='container'>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<div id='home'>
<h1>Choosing an OSS license doesnt need to be scary.</h1>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<h2>
<span>{</span>
Which of the following best describes your situation?
<span>}</span>
</h2>
<ul class="situations cf">
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<li class='whatever'>
<a href="licenses/mit"><img height='57' src='images/three-arrows@2x.png' width='72'></a>
<h3><a href="licenses/mit">Do what you like with my code.</a></h3>
<p>
The <a href="licenses/mit">MIT License</a> is a permissive license that is short and to the point. It lets people do anything with your code with proper attribution and without warranty.
</p>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<p>
<strong>jQuery</strong> and <strong>Rails</strong> use the MIT License.
</p>
</li>
<li class='patents'>
<a href="licenses/apache"><img height='72' src='images/lightbulb@2x.png' width='43'></a>
<h3><a href="licenses/apache">Im concerned about patents.</a></h3>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<p>
The <a href="licenses/apache/">Apache License</a> is a permissive license similar to the MIT License, but it provides a patent license for any code that infringes on a contributors patents.
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
</p>
<p>
<strong>Apache</strong>, <strong>SVN</strong>, and <strong>NuGet</strong> use the Apache License.
</p>
</li>
<li class='reciprocity'>
2012-11-27 16:16:07 -05:00
<!--
TODO: We might need a GPL landing page here so we're not making any political statements
2012-11-27 16:16:07 -05:00
-->
<a href="licenses/gpl-v2"><img height='69' src='images/circular@2x.png' width='72'></a>
<h3><a href="licenses/gpl-v2">I care about reciprocity.</a></h3>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
<p>
The GPL (<a href="licenses/gpl-v2">V2</a> or <a href="licenses/gpl-v3">V3</a>) requires that folks who modify your code also license their changes under the GPL. V3 is similar to V2, but adds a restriction restricting use in hardware that forbids software alterations.
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
</p>
<p>
<strong>Linux</strong> and <strong>Git</strong> use the GPL.
</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p class="see-more callout">
None of these work for me. <a href="licenses">Show me more licenses »</a>
</p>
2012-11-27 16:16:07 -05:00
</div>
<footer class="site-footer cf">
2012-11-27 16:16:07 -05:00
<nav>
<a href="about">About</a>
2012-11-27 16:16:07 -05:00
<a href="#">Terms of Service</a>
</nav>
<p>Please consult a legal expert before adopting a software license for your project.<br>
This site is licensed under the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License</a>.</p>
</footer>
</div>
</body>
</html>