2012-06-08 17:19:25 +02:00
<!DOCTYPE html>
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< html lang = 'en' >
2012-06-08 17:19:25 +02:00
< head >
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< title > ChooseALicense.com< / title >
< meta charset = 'utf-8' / >
< meta content = 'IE=edge,chrome=1' http-equiv = 'X-UA-Compatible' / >
< link href = '/favicon.ico' rel = 'shortcut icon' type = 'image/x-icon' / >
< link href = 'http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Chivo:900' rel = 'stylesheet' type = 'text/css' / >
< link type = "text/css" href = "/css/application.css" media = "screen" rel = "stylesheet" / >
< script type = "text/javascript" src = "/javascripts/modernizr.js" > < / script >
<!-- [if (gte IE 6)&(lte IE 8)]>
< script src = '/javascripts/selectivizr-min.js' type = 'text/javascript' > < / script >
<![endif]-->
2012-06-08 17:19:25 +02:00
< / head >
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< body id = 'home' >
< div id = 'container' >
< div id = 'home' >
< h1 > Choosing an OSS license doesn't need to be scary.< / h1 >
< h2 >
< span > {< / span >
Which of the following best describes your situation?
< span > }< / span >
< / h2 >
< ul id = 'situations' >
< li class = 'whatever' >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
< a href = "licenses/permissive/mit" > < img height = '57' src = 'images/three-arrows@2x.png' width = '72' / > < / a >
< h3 > < a href = "licenses/permissive/mit" > Do what you like with my code.< / a > < / h3 >
2012-06-08 17:19:25 +02:00
< p >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
The < a href = "licenses/permissive/mit" > MIT License< / a > is a permissive license that is short and to the point. It lets people do anything with your code with proper attribution and without warranty.
2012-06-08 17:19:25 +02:00
< / p >
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< p >
< strong > jQuery< / strong > and < strong > Rails< / strong > use the MIT License.
< / p >
< p >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
< a href = "licenses/permissive" class = "button" > See all permissive licenses »< / a >
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< / p >
< / li >
< li class = 'patents' >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
< a href = "licenses/foundation/apache" > < img height = '72' src = 'images/lightbulb@2x.png' width = '43' / > < / a >
< h3 > < a href = "licenses/foundation/apache" > I'm concerned about patents.< / a > < / h3 >
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< p >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
The < a href = "licenses/foundation/apache/" > Apache License< / a > is a permissive license similar to the MIT License, but it provides a patent license for any code that infringes on a contributor’ s patents.
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< / p >
< p >
< strong > Apache< / strong > , < strong > SVN< / strong > , and < strong > NuGet< / strong > use the Apache License.
< / p >
< p >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
< a href = "licenses/foundation" class = "button" > See all foundation-backed licenses »< / a >
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< / p >
< / li >
< li class = 'reciprocity' >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
<!--
TODO: We might need a GPL landing page here so we're not making any political statements
-->
< a href = "licenses/reciprocal/gpl-v2" > < img height = '69' src = 'images/circular@2x.png' width = '72' / > < / a >
< h3 > < a href = "licenses/reciprocal/gpl-v2" > I care about reciprocity.< / a > < / h3 >
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< p >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
The GPL (< a href = "licenses/reciprocal/gpl-v2" > V2< / a > or < a href = "licenses/reciprocal/gpl-v3" > V3< / a > ) requires that folks who modify your code also license their changes under the GPL. V3 is similar to V2, but adds a restriction restricting use in hardware that forbids software alterations.
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< / p >
< p >
< strong > Linux< / strong > and < strong > Git< / strong > use the GPL.
< / p >
< p >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
< a href = "licenses/reciprocal" class = "button" > See all reciprocal licenses »< / a >
2012-09-12 15:20:27 -04:00
< / p >
< / li >
< / ul >
< / div >
2012-06-08 17:19:25 +02:00
< / div >
< / body >
2012-11-26 10:37:37 -08:00
< / html >