1
0
mirror of git://git.gnupg.org/gnupg.git synced 2024-11-09 21:28:51 +01:00
Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Werner Koch
5dac85fba7
doc: Revert the bug reporting address to bugs.gnupg.org
--

dev.gnupg org is the development platform but the canonical bug
address is and has always been bugs.gnupg.org.  We should keep on
using this address for the case that we switch the tracker again or
split it off the development system.

That is also the reason why we should keep on communicating a plain
bug number without the 'T' prefix.

Signed-off-by: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
2017-07-24 10:43:27 +02:00
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
705da1eb23 docs: Point to https://dev.gnupg.org/ .
Replace mentions of bugs.gnupg.org with https://dev.gnupg.org/.  Since
the project has transitioned to a better workflow for supporting
contributions, we should ensure that our documentation points to the
right place.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
2017-05-18 15:05:57 -04:00
Justus Winter
993f36e23c Reword feature description.
--
Suggested-by: Peter Gutmann
Signed-off-by: Justus Winter <justus@g10code.com>
2016-08-03 17:00:40 +02:00
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
dc107b7850 More cleanup of "allow to".
* README, agent/command.c, agent/keyformat.txt, common/i18n.c,
  common/iobuf.c, common/keyserver.h, dirmngr/cdblib.c,
  dirmngr/ldap-wrapper.c, doc/DETAILS, doc/TRANSLATE,
  doc/announce-2.1.txt, doc/gpg.texi, doc/gpgsm.texi,
  doc/scdaemon.texi, doc/tools.texi, doc/whats-new-in-2.1.txt,
  g10/export.c, g10/getkey.c, g10/import.c, g10/keyedit.c, m4/ksba.m4,
  m4/libgcrypt.m4, m4/ntbtls.m4, po/ca.po, po/cs.po, po/da.po,
  po/de.po, po/el.po, po/eo.po, po/es.po, po/et.po, po/fi.po,
  po/fr.po, po/gl.po, po/hu.po, po/id.po, po/it.po, po/ja.po,
  po/nb.po, po/pl.po, po/pt.po, po/ro.po, po/ru.po, po/sk.po,
  po/sv.po, po/tr.po, po/uk.po, po/zh_CN.po, po/zh_TW.po,
  scd/app-p15.c, scd/ccid-driver.c, scd/command.c, sm/gpgsm.c,
  sm/sign.c, tools/gpgconf-comp.c, tools/gpgtar.h: replace "Allow to"
  with clearer text.

In standard English, the normal construction is "${XXX} allows ${YYY}
to" -- that is, the subject (${XXX}) of the sentence is allowing the
object (${YYY}) to do something.  When the object is missing, the
phrasing sounds awkward, even if the object is implied by context.
There's almost always a better construction that isn't as awkward.

These changes should make the language a bit clearer.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
2016-08-03 16:55:33 +02:00
Werner Koch
e0db5af7ed doc: Add announce text for 2.1
--
2014-11-06 10:03:39 +01:00