security-and-privacy/gnupg
security-and-privacy/gnupg
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of git://git.gnupg.org/gnupg.git synced 2025-07-02 22:46:30 +02:00
Code Activity

More fixes to the multiple sig problem.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Werner Koch 2000-10-14 16:45:20 +00:00
parent 3670933210
commit d94440db99
5 changed files with 38 additions and 7 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
doc/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2000-10-14 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
* faq.raw: Add an answer to the problem of multiple signatures.
Wed Oct 4 15:50:18 CEST 2000 Werner Koch <wk@openit.de>
* gpgv.sgml: New.
@ -10,11 +14,11 @@ Thu Sep 14 14:20:38 CEST 2000 Werner Koch <wk@openit.de>
Wed Jul 12 13:32:06 CEST 2000 Werner Koch <wk@>
* gpg.sgml: Add a note about the availability of the GPH.
* gpg.sgml: Add a note about the availability of the GPH.
2000-07-03 13:59:24 Werner Koch (wk@habibti.openit.de)
* DETAILS, FAQ: Typo fixes by Yosiaki IIDA.
* DETAILS, FAQ: Typo fixes by Yosiaki IIDA.
2000-05-12 10:57:21 Werner Koch (wk@habibti.openit.de)

12
doc/faq.raw
View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The most recent version of the FAQ is available from
[H pre]
Version: 0.2
Last-Modified: Oct 01, 2000
Last-Modified: Oct 14, 2000
Maintained-by: [$maintainer]
[H/pre]
@ -466,6 +466,16 @@ in it - why?
Good mail clients remove those extra dashes when displaying such a
message.
<Q> I have multiple signatures in a file and GnuPG says, the signatures are
bad.
Due to different message formats GnuPG is not always able to split such a
file unambiguously into the it's parts. The result is that GnuPG claims
the signature(s) is bad.
The only way to have multiple signatures in a file is by using the
OpenPGP format with one-pass-signature packets (which is GnuPG's
default) or the cleartext signed format.
<S> ADVANCED TOPICS