1703: Trigger CodeCoverage manually instead of on each PR r=irevoire a=curquiza
Since no one is using it now on the PRs, we would rather get a state of the code coverage once (triggered manually) rather than on each PR.
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar <clementine@meilisearch.com>
1724: Redo CONTRIBUTING.md r=curquiza a=curquiza
- Update `Development` section
- Update the `Git Guidelines` section
- Remove `Benchmarking & Profiling` -> done on the milli side at the moment
- Remove `Humans` -> synchronization job done by the manager of the core team at the moment
- Remove `Changelog` section -> done by the manager and the docs team
- Remove `Documentation` section -> job done by the manager to synchronize both teams.
Fixes#1723 at the same time
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar <clementine@meilisearch.com>
1659: deps: unify pest dependency r=MarinPostma a=happysalada
meilisearch dependends on two different versions of pest.
This can be problematic for some build systems (e.g. NixOS).
Since the repo hasn't received an update in a while, in the meantime, use the later version of the two pest dependencies.
Context: this has been discussed previously https://github.com/meilisearch/MeiliSearch/issues/1273
meilisearch has been selected by ngi to be packaged for nixos. A patch can be applied to make the changes proposed in this PR. This PR intends to see how the maintainers of meilisearch would feel about the patch.
What was done.
- Add an override for the pest dependency in Cargo.toml.
- recreate the Cargo.lock with `cargo update`. This has had the side effect of updating some dependencies.
I ran the tests on darwin. My machine is quite old so I had 8 failures due to a timeout. None of the failures look like they are due to the new dependencies.
Checking the pest repo, it seems there are some recent commits, however no sure date of when there could be a new release.
If this gets accepted, there is no need to do a new release, nixos can just target the new commit.
If you feel it's too much pain for not enough gain, no worries at all!
Co-authored-by: happysalada <raphael@megzari.com>
1692: Use tikv-jemallocator instead of jemallocator r=curquiza a=felixonmars
`jemallocator` has been abandoned for nearly two years, and `rustc`
itself moved to use `tikv-jemallocator` instead:
3965773ae7
Let's switch to a better maintained version.
Co-authored-by: Felix Yan <felixonmars@archlinux.org>
`jemallocator` has been abandoned for nearly two years, and `rustc`
itself moved to use `tikv-jemallocator` instead:
3965773ae7
Let's switch to a better maintained version.
