Commit Graph

285 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Clément Renault
44b5b9e1a7
Improve the documentation of the FacetSearchQuery struct 2023-06-29 10:28:23 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
68356869c0
Remove /experimental-features verbs that weren't in the PRD 2023-06-29 10:02:55 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
605c1dd54a
Fix analytics 2023-06-28 16:41:56 +02:00
Clément Renault
3e3f73ba1e
Fix the analytics 2023-06-28 15:45:09 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
82e1f59f1e
Add attributes_to_search_on 2023-06-28 15:28:24 +02:00
Clément Renault
32f2556d22
Move the additional_search_parameters_provided analytic inside facets 2023-06-28 15:06:09 +02:00
Kerollmops
63fd10aaa5
Fix the invalid facet name field error code 2023-06-28 15:06:09 +02:00
Kerollmops
29b40295b8
Ignore unknown facet search query parameters 2023-06-28 15:06:09 +02:00
Kerollmops
904f6574bf
Make rustfmt happy 2023-06-28 15:06:08 +02:00
Kerollmops
6fb8af423c
Rename the hits and query output into facetHits and facetQuery respectively 2023-06-28 15:06:08 +02:00
Kerollmops
cb0bb399fa
Fix the error code returned when the facetName field is missing 2023-06-28 15:06:08 +02:00
Clément Renault
87e22e436a
Fix compilation issues 2023-06-28 15:01:51 +02:00
Clément Renault
55c17aa38b
Rename the SearchForFacetValues struct 2023-06-28 15:01:50 +02:00
Clément Renault
f36de2115f
Make clippy happy 2023-06-28 15:01:50 +02:00
Clément Renault
702041b7e1
Improve the returned errors from the facet-search route 2023-06-28 15:01:48 +02:00
Clément Renault
93f30e65a9
Return the correct response JSON object from the facet-search route 2023-06-28 14:58:42 +02:00
Clément Renault
893592c5e9
Send analytics about the facet-search route 2023-06-28 14:58:42 +02:00
Clément Renault
e81809aae7
Make the search for facet work 2023-06-28 14:58:41 +02:00
Kerollmops
ce7e7f12c8
Introduce the facet search route 2023-06-28 14:58:41 +02:00
meili-bors[bot]
9deeec88e0
Merge #3861
3861: Add "meilisearch" prefix to last metrics that were missing it r=Kerollmops a=dureuill

# Pull Request

## Related issue
Related to #3790 

## What does this PR do?
- change implementation to follow the spec on metrics name
- regenerate grafana dashboard from the code

## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [ ] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [ ] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [ ] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?

Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!


Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
2023-06-28 09:28:31 +00:00
Louis Dureuil
ea68ccd034
prefix http_* metrics by meilisearch 2023-06-28 11:21:50 +02:00
meili-bors[bot]
d4f10800f2
Merge #3834
3834: Define searchable fields at runtime r=Kerollmops a=ManyTheFish

## Summary
This feature allows the end-user to search in one or multiple attributes using the search parameter `attributesToSearchOn`:

```json
{
  "q": "Captain Marvel",
  "attributesToSearchOn": ["title"]
}
```

This feature act like a filter, forcing Meilisearch to only return the documents containing the requested words in the attributes-to-search-on. Note that, with the matching strategy `last`, Meilisearch will only ensure that the first word is in the attributes-to-search-on, but, the retrieved documents will be ordered taking into account the word contained in the attributes-to-search-on. 

## Trying the prototype

A dedicated docker image has been released for this feature:

#### last prototype version:

```bash
docker pull getmeili/meilisearch:prototype-define-searchable-fields-at-search-time-1
```

#### others prototype versions:

```bash
docker pull getmeili/meilisearch:prototype-define-searchable-fields-at-search-time-0
```

## Technical Detail

The attributes-to-search-on list is given to the search context, then, the search context uses the `fid_word_docids`database using only the allowed field ids instead of the global `word_docids` database. This is the same for the prefix databases.
The database cache is updated with the merged values, meaning that the union of the field-id-database values is only made if the requested key is missing from the cache.

### Relevancy limits

Almost all ranking rules behave as expected when ordering the documents.
Only `proximity` could miss-order documents if all the searched words are in the restricted attribute but a better proximity is found in an ignored attribute in a document that should be ranked lower. I put below a failing test showing it:
```rust
#[actix_rt::test]
async fn proximity_ranking_rule_order() {
    let server = Server::new().await;
    let index = index_with_documents(
        &server,
        &json!([
        {
            "title": "Captain super mega cool. A Marvel story",
            // Perfect distance between words in an ignored attribute
            "desc": "Captain Marvel",
            "id": "1",
        },
        {
            "title": "Captain America from Marvel",
            "desc": "a Shazam ersatz",
            "id": "2",
        }]),
    )
    .await;

    // Document 2 should appear before document 1.
    index
        .search(json!({"q": "Captain Marvel", "attributesToSearchOn": ["title"], "attributesToRetrieve": ["id"]}), |response, code| {
            assert_eq!(code, 200, "{}", response);
            assert_eq!(
                response["hits"],
                json!([
                    {"id": "2"},
                    {"id": "1"},
                ])
            );
        })
        .await;
}
```

Fixing this would force us to create a `fid_word_pair_proximity_docids` and a `fid_word_prefix_pair_proximity_docids` databases which may multiply the keys of `word_pair_proximity_docids` and `word_prefix_pair_proximity_docids` by the number of attributes in the searchable_attributes list. If we think we should fix this test, I'll suggest doing it in another PR.

## Related

Fixes #3772

Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
2023-06-28 08:19:23 +00:00
meili-bors[bot]
dc293911ad
Merge #3745
3745: tests: add unit test for `PayloadTooLarge` error r=curquiza a=cymruu

# Pull Request
Add a unit test for the `Payload`, which verifies that a request with a payload that is too large is rejected with the appropriate message.
This was requested in this PR https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/pull/3739

## Related issue
https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/pull/3739

## What does this PR do?
- Adds requested test

## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [ ] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [ ] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [ ] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?

Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!


Co-authored-by: Filip Bachul <filipbachul@gmail.com>
2023-06-27 14:58:23 +00:00
Louis Dureuil
b4b686d253
Merge all analytics events pertaining to updating the experimental features 2023-06-27 15:16:23 +02:00
Clément Renault
e69be93e42
Log warn about using both q and vector field parameters 2023-06-27 12:32:44 +02:00
Clément Renault
b2b413db12
Return all the _semanticScore values in the documents 2023-06-27 12:32:43 +02:00
Clément Renault
f3e4d70638
Send analytics about the query vector length 2023-06-27 12:32:43 +02:00
Kerollmops
eecf20f109
Introduce a new invalid_vector_store 2023-06-27 12:32:42 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
864ad2a23c
Check that vector store feature is enabled 2023-06-27 12:32:42 +02:00
Kerollmops
66fb5c150c
Rename _semanticSimilarity into _semanticScore 2023-06-27 12:32:42 +02:00
Kerollmops
7aa1275337
Display the _semanticSimilarity even if the _vectors field is not displayed 2023-06-27 12:32:41 +02:00
Kerollmops
737aec1705
Expose an _semanticSimilarity as a dot product in the documents 2023-06-27 12:32:41 +02:00
Kerollmops
1b2923f7c0
Return the vector in the output of the search routes 2023-06-27 12:32:40 +02:00
Clément Renault
642b0f3a1b
Expose a new vector field on the search route 2023-06-27 12:32:38 +02:00
Clément Renault
cad90e8cbc
Add a vector field to the search routes 2023-06-27 12:32:38 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
13e9b4c2e5
Add dump support 2023-06-26 16:29:43 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
cca6e47ec1
Errors when GETting metrics without the feature gate 2023-06-26 16:29:43 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
6196a53668
Gate score_details behind a runtime experimental feature flag 2023-06-26 16:29:43 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
bb6448dc2e
Compute instance features from CLI options 2023-06-26 16:29:43 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
eef9293630
New route to set some experimental features 2023-06-26 16:29:43 +02:00
ManyTheFish
114f878205 Rename restrictSearchableAttributes into attributesToSearchOn 2023-06-26 14:55:57 +02:00
ManyTheFish
461b5118bd Add API search setting 2023-06-26 14:55:14 +02:00
Cong Chen
6d4981ec25 Expose lastUpdate and isIndexing in /stats endpoint 2023-06-23 07:24:25 +08:00
Louis Dureuil
11d32ad192
Add very light analytics for scoring 2023-06-22 12:39:14 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
da833eb095
Expose the scores and detailed scores in the API 2023-06-22 12:39:14 +02:00
Filip Bachul
9015a8e8d9 Merge branch 'main' into cymruu/payload-unit-test 2023-06-21 09:26:50 +02:00
meili-bors[bot]
c1e3cc04b0
Merge #3811
3811: Bring back changes from `release-v1.2.0` to `main` r=Kerollmops a=curquiza



Co-authored-by: Loïc Lecrenier <loic.lecrenier@me.com>
Co-authored-by: meili-bors[bot] <89034592+meili-bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Filip Bachul <filipbachul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
2023-06-06 13:10:24 +00:00
Tamo
2acc3ec5ee
fix the type of the document deletion by filter tasks 2023-05-30 15:18:52 +02:00
Tamo
c9b65677bf
return the on disk size actually used by meilisearch 2023-05-25 18:30:30 +02:00
Tamo
35d5556f1f
prefix all the metrics by meilisearch_ 2023-05-25 17:41:53 +02:00
Tamo
c433bdd1cd add a view for the task queue in the metrics 2023-05-25 12:58:13 +02:00
Tamo
1b601f70c6 increase the bucketing of requests 2023-05-25 11:08:16 +02:00
Tamo
9111f5176f get rid of the invalid document delete filter in favor of the invalid document filter 2023-05-24 11:53:16 +02:00
Tamo
b9dd092a62 make the details return null in the originalFilter field if no filter was provided + add a big test on the details 2023-05-24 11:48:22 +02:00
Tamo
ca99bc3188 implement the missing document filter error code when deleting documents 2023-05-24 11:29:20 +02:00
Tamo
57d53de402 Increase the number of buckets 2023-05-24 10:47:15 +02:00
meili-bors[bot]
6ce1ce77e6
Merge #3738
3738: Add analytics on the get documents resource r=dureuill a=irevoire

# Pull Request

## Related issue
Fixes https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3737
Related spec https://github.com/meilisearch/specifications/pull/234

## What does this PR do?
Add the analytics for the following routes:
- `GET` - `/indexes/:uid/documents`
- `GET` - `/indexes/:uid/documents/:doc_id`
- `POST` - `/indexes/:uid/documents/fetch`

These analytics are aggregated between two events:
- `Documents Fetched GET`
- `Documents Fetched POST`

That shares the same payload:
 Property name | Description | Example |
|---------------|-------------|---------|
| `requests.total_received` | Total number of request received in this batch | 325 |
| `per_document_id` | `false` | false |
| `per_filter` | `true` if `POST /indexes/:indexUid/documents/fetch` endpoint was used with a filter in this batch, otherwise `false` | false |
| `pagination.max_limit` | Highest value given for the `limit` parameter in this batch | 60 |
| `pagination.max_offset` | Highest value given for the `offset` parameter in this batch | 1000 |

Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
2023-05-16 19:37:41 +00:00
Tamo
96da5130a4
fix the error code in case of not filterable attributes on the get / delete documents by filter routes 2023-05-16 13:56:18 +02:00
Filip Bachul
64b11f45d7 fix test name 2023-05-16 09:24:49 +02:00
Clément Renault
13f870e993
Fix typos and documentation issues 2023-05-15 15:11:45 +02:00
Kerollmops
f759ec7fad
Expose a flag to enable the MDB_WRITEMAP flag 2023-05-15 11:38:43 +02:00
Filip Bachul
e68d86d6b6 tests: add unit test for PayloadTooLarge 2023-05-11 20:51:10 +02:00
Filip Bachul
25209a3590 introduce remaining field in Payload 2023-05-10 20:55:18 +02:00
Filip Bachul
3064ea6495 fix: update payload_too_large error message to include human readable maximum acceptable payload size 2023-05-10 18:16:59 +02:00
Tamo
46ec8a97e9
rename the analytics according to the spec 2023-05-10 14:28:30 +02:00
Tamo
c42a65a297
Update meilisearch/src/analytics/segment_analytics.rs
Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
2023-05-10 14:28:30 +02:00
Tamo
d08f8690d2
add analytics on the get documents resource 2023-05-10 14:28:30 +02:00
Tamo
11e394dba1
merge the document fetch and get error codes 2023-05-04 15:39:49 +02:00
Tamo
469d2f2a9c
fix the fields field of the POST fetch document API 2023-05-04 15:34:09 +02:00
Tamo
ed3dfbe729
add error codes and tests 2023-05-04 15:34:08 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
441641397b
Implement document get with filters 2023-05-04 15:32:34 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
745c1a2668
Make parse_filter pub 2023-05-04 15:31:53 +02:00
meili-bors[bot]
a95128df6b
Merge #3550
3550: Delete documents by filter r=irevoire a=dureuill

# Prototype `prototype-delete-by-filter-0`

Usage:
A new route is available under `POST /indexes/{index_uid}/documents/delete` that allows you to delete your documents by filter.
The expected payload looks like that:
```json
{
  "filter": "doggo = bernese",
}
```

It'll then enqueue a task in your task queue that'll delete all the documents matching this filter once it's processed.
Here is an example of the associated details;
```json
  "details": {
    "deletedDocuments": 53,
    "originalFilter": "\"doggo = bernese\""
  }
```

----------


# Pull Request

## Related issue
Related to https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3477

## What does this PR do?

### User standpoint

- Modifies the `/indexes/{:indexUid}/documents/delete-batch` route to accept either the existing array of documents ids, or a JSON object with a `filter` field representing a filter to apply. If that latter variant is used, any document matching the filter will be deleted.

### Implementation standpoint

- (processing time version) Adds a new BatchKind that is not autobatchable and that performs the delete by filter
- Reuse the `documentDeletion` task with a new `originalFilter` detail that replaces the `providedIds` detail.

## Example

<details>
<summary>Sample request, response and task result</summary>

Request:

```
curl \
  -X POST 'http://localhost:7700/indexes/index-10/documents/delete-batch' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data-binary '{ "filter" : "mass = 600"}'
```

Response:

```
{
  "taskUid": 3902,
  "indexUid": "index-10",
  "status": "enqueued",
  "type": "documentDeletion",
  "enqueuedAt": "2023-02-28T20:50:31.667502Z"
}
```

Task log:

```json
    {
      "uid": 3906,
      "indexUid": "index-12",
      "status": "succeeded",
      "type": "documentDeletion",
      "canceledBy": null,
      "details": {
        "deletedDocuments": 3,
        "originalFilter": "\"mass = 600\""
      },
      "error": null,
      "duration": "PT0.001819S",
      "enqueuedAt": "2023-03-07T08:57:20.11387Z",
      "startedAt": "2023-03-07T08:57:20.115895Z",
      "finishedAt": "2023-03-07T08:57:20.117714Z"
    }
```

</details>

## Draft status

- [ ] Error handling
- [ ] Analytics
- [ ] Do we want to reuse the `delete-batch` route in this way, or create a new route instead?
- [ ] Should the filter be applied at request time or when the deletion task is processed? 
  - The first commit in this PR applies the filter at request time, meaning that even if a document is modified in a way that no longer matches the filter in a later update, it will be deleted as long as the deletion task is processed after that update. 
  - The other commits in this PR apply the filter only when the asynchronous deletion task is processed, meaning that documents that match the filter at processing time are deleted even if they didn't match the filter at request time.
- [ ] If keeping the filter at request time, find a more elegant way to recover the user document ids from the internal document ids. The current way implemented in the first commit of this PR involves getting all the documents matching the filter, looking for the value of their primary key, and turning it into a string by copy-pasting routines found in milli...
- [ ] Security consideration, if any
- [ ] Fix the tests (but waiting until product questions are resolved)
- [ ] Add delete by filter specific tests



Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
2023-05-04 10:44:41 +00:00
meili-bors[bot]
e0537c3870
Merge #3720
3720: Change links of docs everywhere r=curquiza a=curquiza

Completely fixes #3668 

Co-authored-by: curquiza <clementine@meilisearch.com>
2023-05-04 10:07:41 +00:00
Tamo
aa7537a11e
make the autodeletion work with a fixed number of tasks and update the tests 2023-05-04 00:06:49 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
d5059520aa
Fix typo 2023-05-03 22:27:03 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
1c3642c9b2
Fix deletion per filter analytics 2023-05-03 22:26:51 +02:00
curquiza
30edba3497 Update links of the docs 2023-05-03 19:14:57 +02:00
Tamo
b5fe0b2b07
fix the details 2023-05-03 17:41:50 +02:00
Tamo
fc8c1d118d
fix the analytics 2023-05-03 17:41:50 +02:00
Tamo
0548ab9038
create and use the error code 2023-05-03 17:41:50 +02:00
Tamo
143acb9cdc
update the tests 2023-05-03 17:41:49 +02:00
Tamo
4b92f1b269
wip 2023-05-03 17:41:49 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
732c52093d
Processing time without autobatching implementation 2023-05-03 17:41:48 +02:00
Louis Dureuil
05cc463fbc
Draft implementation of filter support for /delete-by-batch route 2023-05-03 17:41:48 +02:00
TATHAGATA ROY
feaf25a95d Updated messages pointing to the docs website 2023-04-28 20:52:03 +00:00
Kerollmops
a3cf104736
Fix the compilation 2023-04-24 17:50:58 +02:00
bors[bot]
654a3a9e19
Merge #3688
3688: Following release v1.1.1: bring back changes into `main` r=curquiza a=curquiza

`@meilisearch/engine-team` ensure the changes we bring to `main` are the ones you want

Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: bors[bot] <26634292+bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: dureuill <dureuill@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-24 11:38:23 +00:00
Tamo
b4fabce36d
update the error message + update the task db size to 20GiB with a limit at 50% 2023-04-12 18:54:11 +02:00
Tamo
be69ab320d
stops receiving tasks once the task queue is full 2023-04-12 18:54:11 +02:00
Tamo
4d308d5237 Improve the health route by ensuring lmdb is not down
And refactorize slightly the auth controller.
2023-04-06 15:31:42 +02:00
Tamo
597d57bf1d Merge branch 'main' into bring-back-changes-v1.1.0 2023-04-05 11:32:14 +02:00
Tamo
cf5145b542 Reduce the time to import a dump
With this commit, for a dump containing 1M tasks we went from 3m36s to import the task queue down to 1m02s
2023-03-29 14:27:40 +02:00
bors[bot]
fb1260ee88
Merge #3568 #3569
3568: CI: Fix `publish-aarch64` job that still uses ubuntu-18.04 r=Kerollmops a=curquiza

Fixes #3563 

Main change
- add the usage of the `ubuntu-18.04` container instead of the native `ubuntu-18.04` of GitHub actions: I had to install docker in the container.

Small additional changes
- remove useless `fail-fast` and unused/irrelevant matrix inputs (`build`, `linker`, `os`, `use-cross`...)
- Remove useless step in job

Proof of work with this CI triggered on this current branch: https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/actions/runs/4366233882

3569: Enhance Japanese language detection r=dureuill a=ManyTheFish

# Pull Request

This PR is a prototype and can be tested by downloading [the dedicated docker image](https://hub.docker.com/layers/getmeili/meilisearch/prototype-better-language-detection-0/images/sha256-a12847de00e21a71ab797879fd09777dadcb0881f65b5f810e7d1ed434d116ef?context=explore):

```bash
$ docker pull getmeili/meilisearch:prototype-better-language-detection-0
```

## Context
Some Languages are harder to detect than others, this miss-detection leads to bad tokenization making some words or even documents completely unsearchable. Japanese is the main Language affected and can be detected as Chinese which has a completely different way of tokenization.

A [first iteration has been implemented for v1.1.0](https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/pull/3347) but is an insufficient enhancement to make Japanese work. This first implementation was detecting the Language during the indexing to avoid bad detections during the search.
Unfortunately, some documents (shorter ones) can be wrongly detected as Chinese running bad tokenization for these documents and making possible the detection of Chinese during the search because it has been detected during the indexing.

For instance, a Japanese document `{"id": 1, "name": "東京スカパラダイスオーケストラ"}` is detected as Japanese during indexing, during the search the query `東京` will be detected as Japanese because only Japanese documents have been detected during indexing despite the fact that v1.0.2 would detect it as Chinese.
However if in the dataset there is at least one document containing a field with only Kanjis like:
_A document with only 1 field containing only Kanjis:_
```json
{
 "id":4,
 "name": "東京特許許可局"
}
```
_A document with 1 field containing only Kanjis and 1 field containing several Japanese characters:_
```json
{
 "id":105,
 "name": "東京特許許可局",
 "desc": "日経平均株価は26日 に約8カ月ぶりに2万4000円の心理的な節目を上回った。株高を支える材料のひとつは、自民党総裁選で3選を決めた安倍晋三首相の経済政策への期待だ。恩恵が見込まれるとされる人材サービスや建設株の一角が買われている。ただ思惑が先行して資金が集まっている面 は否めない。実際に政策効果を取り込む企業はどこか、なお未知数だ。"
}
```

Then, in both cases, the field `name` will be detected as Chinese during indexing allowing the search to detect Chinese in queries. Therefore,  the query `東京` will be detected as Chinese and only the two last documents will be retrieved by Meilisearch.

## Technical Approach

The current PR partially fixes these issues by:
1) Adding a check over potential miss-detections and rerunning the extraction of the document forcing the tokenization over the main Languages detected in it.
 >  1) run a first extraction allowing the tokenizer to detect any Language in any Script
 >  2) generate a distribution of tokens by Script and Languages (`script_language`)
 >  3) if for a Script we have a token distribution of one of the Language that is under the threshold, then we rerun the extraction forbidding the tokenizer to detect the marginal Languages
 >  4) the tokenizer will fall back on the other available Languages to tokenize the text. For example, if the Chinese were marginally detected compared to the Japanese on the CJ script, then the second extraction will force Japanese tokenization for CJ text in the document. however, the text on another script like Latin will not be impacted by this restriction.

2) Adding a filtering threshold during the search over Languages that have been marginally detected in documents

## Limits
This PR introduces 2 arbitrary thresholds:
1) during the indexing, a Language is considered miss-detected if the number of detected tokens of this Language is under 10% of the tokens detected in the same Script (Japanese and Chinese are 2 different Languages sharing the "same" script "CJK").
2) during the search, a Language is considered marginal if less than 5% of documents are detected as this Language.

This PR only partially fixes these issues:
-  the query `東京` now find Japanese documents if less than 5% of documents are detected as Chinese.
-  the document with the id `105` containing the Japanese field `desc` but the miss-detected field `name` is now completely detected and tokenized as Japanese and is found with the query `東京`.
-  the document with the id `4` no longer breaks the search Language detection but continues to be detected as a Chinese document and can't be found during the search.

## Related issue
Fixes #3565

## Possible future enhancements
- Change or contribute to the Library used to detect the Language
  - the related issue on Whatlang: https://github.com/greyblake/whatlang-rs/issues/122

Co-authored-by: curquiza <clementine@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Many the fish <many@meilisearch.com>
2023-03-09 15:34:35 +00:00
Many the fish
dea101e3d9
Update meilisearch/src/routes/indexes/mod.rs
Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
2023-03-09 15:17:03 +01:00
ManyTheFish
dff2715ef3 Try removing needless collect 2023-03-09 11:28:10 +01:00
ManyTheFish
b4b859ec8c Fix typos 2023-03-09 10:58:35 +01:00
ManyTheFish
7e2fd82e41 Use Language allow list in the highlighter 2023-03-08 12:44:16 +01:00
ManyTheFish
3092cf0448 Fix clippy errors 2023-03-08 10:53:42 +01:00
Louis Dureuil
2f5b9fbbd8
Restore contribution of the index sizes to the db size
- the index size now contributes to the db size even if the index is not authorized
2023-03-07 14:05:27 +01:00