3389: Return `invalid_search_facets` rather than `bad_request` when using facet on a non filterable attribute r=irevoire a=dureuill
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Fixes https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3384
## What does the PR does
- title
- also adds a test
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!
Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
3370: make the swap indexes not found errors return an IndexNotFound error-code r=irevoire a=irevoire
Fix https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3368
3373: fix a wrong error code and add tests on the document resource r=irevoire a=irevoire
Fix https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3371
3375: Avoid deleting all task invalid canceled by r=irevoire a=Kerollmops
Fixes#3369 by making sure that at least one `canceledBy` task filter parameter matches something.
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
3334: Add specific error codes `immutable_...` r=irevoire a=loiclec
Add the following error codes:
When an immutable field of API key is sent to the `PATCH /keys` route:
- `ImmutableApiKeyUid`
- `ImmutableApiKeyKey`
- `ImmutableApiKeyActions`
- `ImmutableApiKeyIndexes`
- `ImmutableApiKeyExpiresAt`
- `ImmutableApiKeyCreatedAt`
- `ImmutableApiKeyUpdatedAt`
When an immutable field of Index is sent to the `PATCH /indexes/{uid}` route:
- `ImmutableIndexUid`
- `ImmutableIndexCreatedAt`
- `ImmutableIndexUpdatedAt`
Co-authored-by: Loïc Lecrenier <loic.lecrenier@me.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
3266: Improve the way we receive the documents payload- serde multiple ndjson fix r=curquiza a=jiangbo212
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Fixes#3037
## Related PR
#3164
## What does this PR do?
Sorry, This PR is mainly to fix the problems caused by my previously provided PR #3164. It causes multiple ndjson data deserialization failures
- Fix serde multiple ndjson data failures and add test to it
- Fix serde jsonarray error and againest serde it use `from_slice`. only use `from_slice` when serde error category is `data`, it indicate json data is a single json.
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!
Co-authored-by: jiangbo212 <peiyaoliukuan@126.com>
3251: Add a specific test on finite pagination placeolder search with disti… r=curquiza a=ManyTheFish
Add a specific test on finite pagination placeholder search with distinct attributes
related to https://github.com/meilisearch/milli/pull/743
related to https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3200
poke `@curquiza`
> note that the destination branch should be changed
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
3269: Simplify primary key inference r=dureuill a=dureuill
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Related to https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3233
## What does this PR do?
- Integrates https://github.com/meilisearch/milli/pull/752 in meilisearch
- Remove `Serialize` and `Deserialize` from `error::Code` as it is unused.
- No longer filter on `milli` logs when `--log-level` is "info".
- `milli` only has the newly-added inference log at the `info` level (from greping `info` in the codebase)
- the default value for `--log-level` is "INFO" and not "info" since `v0.30` so the filter is not active by default.
- updates milli to v0.38.0
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!
Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
