Commit Graph

2395 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Louis Dureuil
ad9937c755
Fix tests after adding DeletionStrategy 2022-12-19 10:07:17 +01:00
Louis Dureuil
171c942282
Soft-deletion computation no longer takes into account the mapsize
Implemented solution 2.3 from https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3231#issuecomment-1348628824
2022-12-19 10:07:17 +01:00
Louis Dureuil
e2ae3b24aa
Hard or soft delete according to the deletion strategy 2022-12-19 10:00:13 +01:00
Louis Dureuil
fc7618d49b
Add DeletionStrategy 2022-12-19 09:49:58 +01:00
ManyTheFish
7f88c4ff2f Fix #1714 test 2022-12-15 18:22:28 +01:00
ManyTheFish
96d4242b93 Update charabia 2022-12-15 18:22:22 +01:00
bors[bot]
5114686394
Merge #743
743: Fix finite pagination with placeholder search r=Kerollmops a=ManyTheFish

this bug is reproducible on real datasets and is hard to isolate in a simple test.

related to: https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3200

poke `@curquiza` 

Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
2022-12-15 09:31:47 +00:00
ManyTheFish
3322018c06 Fix placeholder search 2022-12-14 20:09:47 +01:00
bors[bot]
0276d5212a
Merge #728
728: Add some integration tests on the sort criterion r=ManyTheFish a=loiclec

This is simply an integration test ensuring that the sort criterion works properly. 

However, only one version of the algorithm is tested here (the iterative one). To test the version that uses the facet DB, one has to manually set the `CANDIDATES_THRESHOLD` constant to `0`. I have done that and ensured that the test still succeeds. However, in the future, we will probably want to have an option to force which algorithm is used at runtime, for testing purposes.


Co-authored-by: Loïc Lecrenier <loic.lecrenier@me.com>
2022-12-14 09:27:12 +00:00
bors[bot]
e2ffc3d69a
Merge #741
741: Add test reproducing the bug fixed by #737 r=Kerollmops a=ManyTheFish

related to #737

Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
2022-12-13 15:02:19 +00:00
ManyTheFish
739da9fd4d Add test 2022-12-13 15:54:43 +01:00
bors[bot]
2af93966e0
Merge #740
740: Fix two nightly errors r=Kerollmops a=irevoire

Currently, we have these two errors on rust nightly. It would be nice to help rustc understand what's going on

```
error[E0658]: anonymous lifetimes in `impl Trait` are unstable
   --> filter-parser/src/lib.rs:173:53
    |
173 | fn ws<'a, O>(inner: impl FnMut(Span<'a>) -> IResult<O>) -> impl FnMut(Span<'a>) -> IResult<O> {
    |                                                     ^ expected named lifetime parameter
    |
    = help: add `#![feature(anonymous_lifetime_in_impl_trait)]` to the crate attributes to enable
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
    |
173 | fn ws<'a, 'a, O>(inner: impl FnMut(Span<'a>) -> IResult<'a, O>) -> impl FnMut(Span<'a>) -> IResult<O> {
    |       +++                                               +++

error[E0658]: anonymous lifetimes in `impl Trait` are unstable
  --> filter-parser/src/error.rs:36:49
   |
36 |     mut parser: impl FnMut(Span<'a>) -> IResult<O>,
   |                                                 ^ expected named lifetime parameter
   |
   = help: add `#![feature(anonymous_lifetime_in_impl_trait)]` to the crate attributes to enable
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
   |
35 ~ pub fn cut_with_err<'a, 'a, O>(
36 ~     mut parser: impl FnMut(Span<'a>) -> IResult<'a, O>,
   |

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`.
error: could not compile `filter-parser` due to 2 previous errors
```

Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
2022-12-13 14:33:40 +00:00
Tamo
2c47500bc3
fix two nightly errors 2022-12-13 15:29:52 +01:00
bors[bot]
406ee31d1a
Merge #737
737: Fix typo initial candidates computation r=Kerollmops a=ManyTheFish

When `Typo` criterion was after a different criterion than `Words` and the previous criterion wasn't returning any candidates at the first iteration of the bucket sort, then the `initial_candidates` were lost.

Now, `Typo`ensure to keep the `initial_candidates` between iterations.


related to https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3200#issuecomment-1345179578
related to https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3228

Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
2022-12-13 10:29:28 +00:00
ManyTheFish
2d8d0af1a6 Rename short name bc by ic for initial_candidates 2022-12-13 10:56:38 +01:00
bors[bot]
e0a8f8cb5a
Merge #734
734: Fix bug 2945/3021 (missing key in documents database) r=Kerollmops a=loiclec

# Pull Request

## Related issue
Fixes (partially, until merged into meilisearch) https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/2945 (until we integrate the new milli bump into meilisearch).

**Note that a dump will not be sufficient to upgrade from meilisearch v0.30.2 to meilisearch v0.30.3 due to this fix** because the bug could have caused the `documents` database to be corrupted. Instead, a full manual reimport of the documents will be necessary.

## What does this PR do?
There was a bug happening when:
1. A few documents are added to the index
2. Some of these documents are soft-deleted
3. New documents are added, replacing existing ones and triggering a hard-deletion

The `IndexDocuments::execute` method would then perform the hard-deletion but forget to change the `external_document_ids` structure appropriately. As a result, the `external_document_ids` would contain keys corresponding to documents that do no exist anymore.

To fix this bug, I split the `DeleteDocuments::execute` method into two: `execute_inner` and `execute`. 
- `execute_inner` returns a `DetailedDocumentDeletionResult` which says whether soft-deletion was used or not
- `execute` keeps the exact same signature and behaviour

Then, when deleting replaced documents inside `IndexDocuments::execute`, we call `DeleteDocuments::execute_inner` instead of `DeleteDocuments::execute`. If soft-deletion was used, nothing more is done. But if hard-deletion was used, we remove every reference to soft-deleted documents in the new `external_documents_ids` structure.

## Correctness

- Every other test still passes
- The reproduction test case now passes
- In a different branch ([`update-fuzz-test`](https://github.com/meilisearch/milli/pull/735)), I created a fuzz-test that reproduces the past two bugs. This fuzz test cannot find this bug through any combination of some hand-selected `DocumentAddition / DocumentDeletion / DocumentClear / SettingsUpdate` operations. In that test, each relevant operations can be executed with or without soft-deletion, and document additions can be done in batches, replacing or updating existing documents.



Co-authored-by: Loïc Lecrenier <loic.lecrenier@me.com>
2022-12-13 09:45:57 +00:00
Loïc Lecrenier
be3b00350c Apply review suggestions: naming and documentation 2022-12-13 10:15:22 +01:00
ManyTheFish
80d34a4169 Fix typo initial candiddates computation 2022-12-12 19:02:48 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
e3ee553dcc Remove soft deleted ids from ExternalDocumentIds during document import
If the document import replaces a document using hard deletion
2022-12-12 14:16:09 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
bebd050961 Add new test for bug 3021 2022-12-08 19:19:40 +01:00
bors[bot]
1f1beae077
Merge #729
729: Fix distincted exhaustive hits r=Kerollmops a=ManyTheFish

This PR changes the name and behavior of `bucket_candidates`:
- `bucket_candidates` become `initial_candidates` that is less confusing
- `initial_candidates` is no more a simple `RoaringBitmap` but an enum allowing us to precise if the candidates are exhaustive or not
- this enum ensures that any modification is allowed only if the candidates are not already exhaustive.

The bug occurred because `initial_candidates` are modified during the bucket sort allowing the estimation to be more and more precise along the search, and this was an issue when the `initial_candidates` were already exhaustive, now, if candidates are exhaustive, then no modifications are made.

Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
2022-12-08 09:26:34 +00:00
ManyTheFish
55724f2412 Introduce an initial candidates set that makes the difference between an exhaustive count and an estimation 2022-12-08 09:41:34 +01:00
ManyTheFish
6d50ea0830 add tests 2022-12-08 08:56:57 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
f37c86e0b2 Add some integration tests on the sort criterion 2022-12-07 15:59:33 +01:00
bors[bot]
098c410612
Merge #727
727: Fix bug in filter search r=Kerollmops a=loiclec

# Pull Request

## Related issue
Fixes (partially, until merged into meilisearch) https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3178

## What does this PR do?
The most important change is this one:
```rust
    // in milli/src/search/facet/facet_range_search.rs, line 239
    let should_stop = {
        match self.right {
            Bound::Included(right) => right < previous_key.left_bound,
            Bound::Excluded(right) => right <= previous_key.left_bound,
            Bound::Unbounded => false,
        }
    };
```
where the operations `<` and `<=` between the two branches were switched. This caused (very few) documents to be missing from filter results.

The second change is a simplification of the algorithm for filters such as `field = value`, where we now perform a direct query into the "Level 0" of the facet db to retrieve the docids instead of invoking the full facet search algorithm. This change is done in `milli/src/search/facet/filter.rs`.

I have added yet more insta-snapshot tests, rechecked the content of the snapshots, and added some integration tests as well. 

This is purely a fix in the search algorithms. Based on this PR alone, a dump will not be necessary to switch from v0.30.1 (where this bug is present) to v0.30.2 (where this PR is merged).


Co-authored-by: Loïc Lecrenier <loic.lecrenier@me.com>
2022-12-07 14:34:59 +00:00
bors[bot]
ee10cb8c87
Merge #726
726: Update the contributing.md r=curquiza a=irevoire



Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
2022-12-07 13:59:04 +00:00
Loïc Lecrenier
d38cc73630 Add one more filter "integration" test 2022-12-07 14:38:25 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
e688581c36 Add tests for facet range search on different field ids 2022-12-07 14:38:21 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
4ac8f96342 Simplify implementation of equality condition in filters 2022-12-07 14:38:18 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
1c9555566e Fix bug in facet range search 2022-12-07 14:38:14 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
303d740245 Prepare fix within facet range search
By creating snapshots and updating the format of the existing
snapshots. The next commit will apply the fix, which will show
its effects cleanly on the old and new snapshot tests
2022-12-07 14:38:10 +01:00
Tamo
250743885d
add a sentence about installing rust-nightly 2022-12-07 12:31:43 +01:00
Tamo
5eecb8489d
Update CONTRIBUTING.md
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar - curqui <clementine@meilisearch.com>
2022-12-07 12:23:12 +01:00
Tamo
0e5c3b1f64
Update CONTRIBUTING.md
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar - curqui <clementine@meilisearch.com>
2022-12-07 12:23:06 +01:00
Tamo
f53bdc4320
update the contributing.md 2022-12-06 17:41:05 +01:00
bors[bot]
0a301b5f88
Merge #723
723: Fix bug in handling of soft deleted documents when updating settings r=Kerollmops a=loiclec

# Pull Request

## Related issue
Fixes (partially, until merged into meilisearch) https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3021

## What does this PR do?
This PR fixes the bug where a `missing key in documents database` internal error message could appear when indexing documents.

When updating the settings, before clearing the database and before creating the transform output, we now modify the `ExternalDocumentsIds` structure to get rid of all references to soft deleted document ids in its FSTs.

It used to be that updating the settings would clear the soft-deleted document ids, but keep the original `ExternalDocumentsIds` structure. As a consequence of this, when processing a future document addition, we could wrongly believe that a document was being replaced when, in fact, it was a completely new document. See the tests `bug_3021_first`, `bug_3021_second`, and `bug_3021` for a minimal test case that would have reproduced the issue.
 
We need to take special care to:
- evaluate how users should update to v0.30.1 (containing this fix): dump? reimporting all documents from scratch?
- understand IF/HOW this bug could have caused duplicate documents to be returned 
- and evaluate the correctness of the fix, of course :)


Co-authored-by: Loïc Lecrenier <loic.lecrenier@me.com>
2022-12-06 14:37:38 +00:00
Loïc Lecrenier
a993b68684 Cargo fmt >:-( 2022-12-06 15:22:10 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
80c7a00567 Fix compilation error in tests of settings update 2022-12-06 15:19:26 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
67d8cec209 Fix bug in handling of soft deleted documents when updating settings 2022-12-06 15:09:19 +01:00
bors[bot]
2a846aaae7
Merge #719
719: Add more members of `filter_parser` to `milli::` & `From<&str>` implementation for `Token` r=Kerollmops a=GregoryConrad

## What does this PR do?
The current `milli::Filter` and `milli::FilterCondition` APIs require working with some members of `filter_parser` directly that `milli::` does *not* re-export to its users (at least when not parsing input using `parse`). Also, using `filter_parser` does not make sense when using milli from an embedded context where there is no query to parse.

Instead of reworking `milli::Filter` and `milli::FilterCondition`, this PR adds two non-breaking changes that ease the use of milli:
- Re-exports more members of the dependent version of `filter_parser` in `milli`
- Implements `From<&str>` for `filter_parser::Token`
  - This will also allow some basic tests that need to create a `Token` from a string to avoid some boilerplate.

In conjunction, both of these will allow milli users to easily create a `Token` from a `&str` without needing to add `filter_parser` as an extra dependency.

Note: I wanted to use `FromStr` for the `From` implementation; however, it requires returning a `Result` which is not needed for the conversion. Thus, I just left it as `From<&str>`.

Co-authored-by: Gregory Conrad <gregorysconrad@gmail.com>
2022-12-06 10:36:00 +00:00
bors[bot]
d6eacb2aac
Merge #722
722: Geosearch for zero radius r=irevoire a=amab8901

# Pull Request

## Related issue
Fixes #3167 (https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/3167)

## What does this PR do?
- allows Geosearch with zero radius to return the specified location when the coordinates match perfectly (instead of returning nothing). See link for more details.
- new attempt on https://github.com/meilisearch/milli/pull/713

## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [ X ] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [ X ] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [ X ] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?

Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!


Co-authored-by: amab8901 <amab8901@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <irevoire@protonmail.ch>
2022-12-05 19:57:08 +00:00
Tamo
212dbfa3b5
Update milli/src/search/facet/filter.rs 2022-12-05 20:56:21 +01:00
amab8901
456da5de9c Geosearch for zero radius 2022-12-05 20:11:46 +01:00
bors[bot]
46e26ab550
Merge #720
720: Make soft deletion optional in document addition and deletion + add lots of tests r=irevoire a=loiclec

# Pull Request

## What does this PR do?
When debugging recent issues, I created a few unit tests in the hopes reproducing the bugs I was looking for. In the end, I didn't find any, but I thought it would still be good to keep those tests. 

More importantly, I added a field to the `DeleteDocuments` and `IndexDocuments` builders, called `disable_soft_deletion`. If set to `true`, the indexing/deletion will never add documents to the `soft_deleted_documents_ids` and instead perform a real deletion of the documents from the databases.

For the new tests, I have:
- Improved the insta-snapshot format of the `external_documents_ids` structure
- Added more tests for the facet DB indexing, deletion, and search algorithms, making sure to test them when the facet DB contains strings (instead of numbers) as well.
- Added more tests for the incremental indexing of the prefix proximity databases. For example, to see if documents are replaced correctly and if common prefixes are deleted correctly.
- Added tests that mix soft deletion and hard deletion, including when processing batches of document updates. 


Co-authored-by: Loïc Lecrenier <loic.lecrenier@me.com>
2022-12-05 18:26:01 +00:00
Loïc Lecrenier
cda4ba2bb6 Add document import tests 2022-12-05 12:02:49 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
ae59d37b75 Improve insta-snap of the external document ids 2022-12-05 10:51:02 +01:00
Loïc Lecrenier
f2cf981641 Add more tests and allow disabling of soft-deletion outside of tests
Also allow disabling soft-deletion in the IndexDocumentsConfig
2022-12-05 10:51:01 +01:00
Gregory Conrad
50954d31fa feat: Re-export Span and Token to milli:: 2022-12-03 13:37:33 -05:00
Gregory Conrad
1b5b5778c1 feat: Add From<&str> implementation for Token 2022-12-03 13:13:41 -05:00
bors[bot]
d3731dda48
Merge #706
706: Limit the reindexing caused by updating settings when not needed r=curquiza a=GregoryConrad

## What does this PR do?
When updating index settings using `update::Settings`, sometimes a `reindex` of `update::Settings` is triggered when it doesn't need to be. This PR aims to prevent those unnecessary `reindex` calls.

For reference, here is a snippet from the current `execute` method in `update::Settings`:
```rust
// ...
if stop_words_updated
    || faceted_updated
    || synonyms_updated
    || searchable_updated
    || exact_attributes_updated
{
    self.reindex(&progress_callback, &should_abort, old_fields_ids_map)?;
}
```

- [x] `faceted_updated` - looks good as-is 
- [x] `stop_words_updated` - looks good as-is 
- [x] `synonyms_updated` - looks good as-is 
- [x] `searchable_updated` - fixed in this PR
- [x] `exact_attributes_updated` - fixed in this PR

## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?

Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!


Co-authored-by: Gregory Conrad <gregorysconrad@gmail.com>
2022-12-01 13:58:02 +00:00