> "Attribute `{}` is not sortable. This index doesn't have configured sortable attributes."
> "Attribute `{}` is not sortable. Available sortable attributes are: `{}`."
coexist in the error handling
436: Speed up the word prefix databases computation time r=Kerollmops a=Kerollmops
This PR depends on the fixes done in #431 and must be merged after it.
In this PR we will bring the `WordPrefixPairProximityDocids`, `WordPrefixDocids` and, `WordPrefixPositionDocids` update structures to a new era, a better era, where computing the word prefix pair proximities costs much fewer CPU cycles, an era where this update structure can use the, previously computed, set of new word docids from the newly indexed batch of documents.
---
The `WordPrefixPairProximityDocids` is an update structure, which means that it is an object that we feed with some parameters and which modifies the LMDB database of an index when asked for. This structure specifically computes the list of word prefix pair proximities, which correspond to a list of pairs of words associated with a proximity (the distance between both words) where the second word is not a word but a prefix e.g. `s`, `se`, `a`. This word prefix pair proximity is associated with the list of documents ids which contains the pair of words and prefix at the given proximity.
The origin of the performances issue that this struct brings is related to the fact that it starts its job from the beginning, it clears the LMDB database before rewriting everything from scratch, using the other LMDB databases to achieve that. I hope you understand that this is absolutely not an optimized way of doing things.
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
442: fix phrase search r=curquiza a=MarinPostma
Run the exact match search on 7 words windows instead of only two. This makes false positive very very unlikely, and impossible on phrase query that are less than seven words.
Co-authored-by: ad hoc <postma.marin@protonmail.com>
431: Fix and improve word prefix pair proximity r=ManyTheFish a=Kerollmops
This PR first fixes the algorithm we used to select and compute the word prefix pair proximity database. The previous version was skipping nearly all of the prefixes. The issue is that this fix made this method to take more time and we were trying to reduce the time spent in it.
With `@ManyTheFish` we found out that we could skip some of the work we were doing by:
- discarding the prefixes that were shorter than a specific threshold (default: 2).
- discarding the word prefix pairs with proximity bigger than a specific threshold (default: 4).
- remove the unused threshold that was specifying a minimum amount of word docids to merge.
We will take more time to do some more optimization, like stop clearing and recomputing from scratch the database, we will compute the subsets of keys to create, keep and merge. This change is a little bit more complex than what this PR does.
I keep this PR as a draft as I want to further test the real gain if it is enough or not if it is valid or not. I advise reviewers to review commit by commit to see the changes bit by bit, reviewing the whole PR can be hard.
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
433: fix(filter): Fix two bugs. r=Kerollmops a=irevoire
- Stop lowercasing the field when looking in the field id map
- When a field id does not exist it means there is currently zero
documents containing this field thus we return an empty RoaringBitmap
instead of throwing an internal error
Will fix https://github.com/meilisearch/MeiliSearch/issues/2082 once meilisearch is released
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
426: Fix search highlight for non-unicode chars r=ManyTheFish a=Samyak2
# Pull Request
## What does this PR do?
Fixes https://github.com/meilisearch/MeiliSearch/issues/1480
<!-- Please link the issue you're trying to fix with this PR, if none then please create an issue first. -->
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
## Changes
The `matching_bytes` function takes a `&Token` now and:
- gets the number of bytes to highlight (unchanged).
- uses `Token.num_graphemes_from_bytes` to get the number of grapheme clusters to highlight.
In essence, the `matching_bytes` function now returns the number of matching grapheme clusters instead of bytes.
Added proper highlighting in the HTTP UI:
- requires dependency on `unicode-segmentation` to extract grapheme clusters from tokens
- `<mark>` tag is put around only the matched part
- before this change, the entire word was highlighted even if only a part of it matched
## Questions
Since `matching_bytes` does not return number of bytes but grapheme clusters, should it be renamed to something like `matching_chars` or `matching_graphemes`? Will this break the API?
Thank you very much `@ManyTheFish` for helping 😄
Co-authored-by: Samyak S Sarnayak <samyak201@gmail.com>
- Stop lowercasing the field when looking in the field id map
- When a field id does not exist it means there is currently zero
documents containing this field thus we returns an empty RoaringBitmap
instead of throwing an internal error
The `matching_bytes` function takes a `&Token` now and:
- gets the number of bytes to highlight (unchanged).
- uses `Token.num_graphemes_from_bytes` to get the number of grapheme
clusters to highlight.
In essence, the `matching_bytes` function returns the number of matching
grapheme clusters instead of bytes. Should this function be renamed
then?
Added proper highlighting in the HTTP UI:
- requires dependency on `unicode-segmentation` to extract grapheme
clusters from tokens
- `<mark>` tag is put around only the matched part
- before this change, the entire word was highlighted even if only a
part of it matched
