3702: Update charabia v0.7.2 r=curquiza a=ManyTheFish
fixes#3701fixes#3689fixes#3285
3710: Updated messages pointing to the docs website r=curquiza a=roy9495
# Pull Request
Fixes partially #3668
## What does this PR do?
- ...Any messages referencing this docs site https://docs.meilisearch.com has been changed to this docs site https://meilisearch.com/docs .
Thanks.
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [x] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: TATHAGATA ROY <98920199+roy9495@users.noreply.github.com>
3718: Fix broken README links r=curquiza a=Kerollmops
This PR fixes#3708 by changing the link to the new SDKs and API Reference pages. I would like to thank `@Tommy-42,` who also found the issue.
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
3709: Add SDKs test in a CI r=Kerollmops a=curquiza
Add a CI running every week to run the `nightly` docker image of Meilisearch with the most "strategic" SDKs (most used, well tested, strongly typed SDK)
- meilisearch-js
- instant-meilisearch
- meilisearch-php
- meilisearch-python
- meilisearch-go
- meilisearch-ruby
- meilisearch-rust
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar <clementine@meilisearch.com>
3571: Introduce two filters to select documents with `null` and empty fields r=irevoire a=Kerollmops
# Pull Request
## Related issue
This PR implements the `X IS NULL`, `X IS NOT NULL`, `X IS EMPTY`, `X IS NOT EMPTY` filters that [this comment](https://github.com/meilisearch/product/discussions/539#discussioncomment-5115884) is describing in a very detailed manner.
## What does this PR do?
### `IS NULL` and `IS NOT NULL`
This PR will be exposed as a prototype for now. Below is the copy/pasted version of a spec that defines this filter.
- `IS NULL` matches fields that `EXISTS` AND `= IS NULL`
- `IS NOT NULL` matches fields that `NOT EXISTS` OR `!= IS NULL`
1. `{"name": "A", "price": null}`
2. `{"name": "A", "price": 10}`
3. `{"name": "A"}`
`price IS NULL` would match 1
`price IS NOT NULL` or `NOT price IS NULL` would match 2,3
`price EXISTS` would match 1, 2
`price NOT EXISTS` or `NOT price EXISTS` would match 3
common query : `(price EXISTS) AND (price IS NOT NULL)` would match 2
### `IS EMPTY` and `IS NOT EMPTY`
- `IS EMPTY` matches Array `[]`, Object `{}`, or String `""` fields that `EXISTS` and are empty
- `IS NOT EMPTY` matches fields that `NOT EXISTS` OR are not empty.
1. `{"name": "A", "tags": null}`
2. `{"name": "A", "tags": [null]}`
3. `{"name": "A", "tags": []}`
4. `{"name": "A", "tags": ["hello","world"]}`
5. `{"name": "A", "tags": [""]}`
6. `{"name": "A"}`
7. `{"name": "A", "tags": {}}`
8. `{"name": "A", "tags": {"t1":"v1"}}`
9. `{"name": "A", "tags": {"t1":""}}`
10. `{"name": "A", "tags": ""}`
`tags IS EMPTY` would match 3,7,10
`tags IS NOT EMPTY` or `NOT tags IS EMPTY` would match 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
`tags IS NULL` would match 1
`tags IS NOT NULL` or `NOT tags IS NULL` would match 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
`tags EXISTS` would match 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10
`tags NOT EXISTS` or `NOT tags EXISTS` would match 6
common query : `(tags EXISTS) AND (tags IS NOT NULL) AND (tags IS NOT EMPTY)` would match 2,4,5,8,9
## What should the reviewer do?
- Check that I tested the filters
- Check that I deleted the ids of the documents when deleting documents
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Kerollmops <clement@meilisearch.com>
3464: Remove CLI changes for clippy r=curquiza a=dureuill
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Reverts #3434, which was linked to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/10087, as putting the lint in the pedantic group [is being uplifted to Rust 1.67.1](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107743#issue-1573438821) (my thanks to everyone involved in this work 🎉).
## Motivation
- Using "standard issue" clippy in the CI spares our contributors and us from knowing/remembering to add the lint when running clippy locally
- In particular, spares us from configuring tools like rust-analyzer to take the lint into account.
- Should this lint come back in another form in the future, we won't blindly ignore it, and we will be able to reassess it, which will be good wrt writing idiomatic Rust. By the time this occurs, lints might be configurable through `clippy.toml` too, which would make disabling one globally much more convenient if needs be.
## Note
We should wait for the release of Rust 1.67.1 and its propagation to our CI before merging this. The PR won't pass CI before this.
Co-authored-by: Louis Dureuil <louis@meilisearch.com>
3696: Remove the unused snapshot files r=dureuill a=irevoire
While « reverting by hand » the PR about the auto batching of the addition&deletion of documents, we forgot to remove the associated snapshot files.
Here is the command I used to generate this PR: `cargo insta test --delete-unreferenced-snapshots`
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
3566: Improve docker cache r=curquiza a=inductor
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Fixes #<issue_number>
## What does this PR do?
- Use `--mount=type=cache` and GHA build cache for faster build
- `=> => transferring context: 75.37MB` to `=> => transferring context: 19.21MB` with `.dockerignore`
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [ ] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!
Co-authored-by: inductor <kela@inductor.me>
Co-authored-by: Clémentine Urquizar - curqui <clementine@meilisearch.com>
3694: Remove Uffizzi because not used by the team r=Kerollmops a=curquiza
After discussion with the team, we don't really use Uffizzi and even had issues with it recently: the preview build failing randomly leading to unwanted GitHub notifications + issue to reach the container
<img width="628" alt="Capture d’écran 2023-04-25 à 11 55 39" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20380692/234298586-ef9cff85-ded8-4ec5-ba13-bb7a24d476b3.png">
Thanks for the involvement of Uffizzi team anyway, the tool is just not adapted to our team 😊
Co-authored-by: curquiza <clementine@meilisearch.com>
