4621: Bring back changes from v1.8.0 into main r=curquiza a=curquiza
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: meili-bors[bot] <89034592+meili-bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
4580: Update the search logs r=Kerollmops a=irevoire
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Fixes https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/4579
## What does this PR do?
- Update the debug implementation of the search query and search results so it’s way smaller and doesn’t display useless information
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
4535: Support Negative Keywords r=ManyTheFish a=Kerollmops
This PR fixes#4422 by supporting `-` before any word in the query.
The minus symbol `-`, from the ASCII table, is not the only character that can be considered the negative operator. You can see the two other matching characters under the `Based on "-" (U+002D)` section on [this unicode reference website](https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+002D).
It's important to notice the strange behavior when a query includes and excludes the same word; only the derivative ( synonyms and split) will be kept:
- If you input `progamer -progamer`, the engine will still search for `pro gamer`.
- If you have the synonym `like = love` and you input `like -like`, it will still search for `love`.
## TODO
- [x] Add analytics
- [x] Add support to the `-` operator
- [x] Make sure to support spaces around `-` well
- [x] Support phrase negation
- [x] Add tests
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
4536: Limit concurrent search requests r=ManyTheFish a=irevoire
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Fixes https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/4489
## What does this PR do?
- Adds a « search queue » that limits the number of search requests we can process at the same time and stores search requests to be processed
- Process only one search request per core/thread (we use available_parallelism)
- When the search queue is full, new search requests replace old ones **randomly**. The reason is that:
- If we serve the oldest one first, like Typesense, we give the worst performances to everyone
- If we serve the latest one, it gets too easy to DoS us (you just need to fill the queue with as many search requests as we can process simultaneously to ensure no other request will ever be processed)
- By picking the search request randomly, we give a chance to recent search requests to be processed while ensuring that we can't be owned unless they fill our queue entirely and we start returning errors 5xx
- Adds an experimental parameter to control the size of the queue
- Adds a bunch of tests to ensure the search queue works correctly
- Ensure the loop consuming the search queue is running in the health route and crashes if it’s not the case
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
