docs/wtfpython
docs/wtfpython
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/satwikkansal/wtfpython synced 2024-11-22 11:04:25 +01:00
Code Releases Activity

Merge pull request #243 from vitorsrg/change/no-char-datatype

Browse Source 
Improve string indexing result explanation
This commit is contained in:
Satwik Kansal 2022-12-05 09:17:50 +05:30 committed by GitHub
commit f5f5208b12
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
README.md vendored
View File

@ -3659,7 +3659,7 @@ What makes those dictionaries become bloated? And why are newly created objects
* Few weird looking but semantically correct statements: * Few weird looking but semantically correct statements:
+ `[] = ()` is a semantically correct statement (unpacking an empty `tuple` into an empty `list`) + `[] = ()` is a semantically correct statement (unpacking an empty `tuple` into an empty `list`)
+ `'a'[0][0][0][0][0]` is also a semantically correct statement as strings are [sequences](https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-sequence)(iterables supporting element access using integer indices) in Python. + `'a'[0][0][0][0][0]` is also semantically correct, because Python doesn't have a character data type like other languages branched from C. So selecting a single character from a string returns a single-character string.
+ `3 --0-- 5 == 8` and `--5 == 5` are both semantically correct statements and evaluate to `True`. + `3 --0-- 5 == 8` and `--5 == 5` are both semantically correct statements and evaluate to `True`.
* Given that `a` is a number, `++a` and `--a` are both valid Python statements but don't behave the same way as compared with similar statements in languages like C, C++, or Java. * Given that `a` is a number, `++a` and `--a` are both valid Python statements but don't behave the same way as compared with similar statements in languages like C, C++, or Java.