1
0
mirror of https://github.com/satwikkansal/wtfpython synced 2024-11-22 11:04:25 +01:00

Add more minor examples

This commit is contained in:
Satwik Kansal 2017-08-30 19:47:09 +05:30
parent 1473de7493
commit b9e044da05

View File

@ -1214,18 +1214,27 @@ def convert_list_to_string(l, iters):
## Minor Ones ## Minor Ones
- `join()` is a string operation instead of list operation. (sort of counter-intuitive at first usage) * `join()` is a string operation instead of list operation. (sort of counter-intuitive at first usage)
**Explanation:** **Explanation:**
If `join()` is a method on a string then it can operate on any iterable (list, tuple, iterators). If it were a method on a list it'd have to be implemented separately by every type. Also, it doesn't make much sense to put a string-specific method on a generic list. If `join()` is a method on a string then it can operate on any iterable (list, tuple, iterators). If it were a method on a list it'd have to be implemented separately by every type. Also, it doesn't make much sense to put a string-specific method on a generic list.
Also, it's string specific, and it sounds wrong to put a string-specific method on a generic list. Also, it's string specific, and it sounds wrong to put a string-specific method on a generic list.
- `[] = ()` is a semantically correct statement (unpacking an empty `tuple` into an empty `list`) * Few weird looking but semantically correct statements:
- Python uses 2 bytes for local variable storage in functions. In theory this means that only 65536 variables can be defined in a function. However, python has a handy solution built in that can be used to store more than 2^16 variable names. The following code demonstrates what happens in the stack when more than 65536 local variables are defined (Warning: This code prints around 2^18 lines of text, so be prepared!): + `[] = ()` is a semantically correct statement (unpacking an empty `tuple` into an empty `list`)
+ `'a'[0][0][0][0][0]` is also a semantically correct statement as strings are iterable in Python.
+ `3 --0-- 5 == 8` and `--5 == 5` are both semantically correct statments and evalute to `True`.
* Booleans are a subclass of `int`
```py
>>> isinstance(True, int)
True
>>> isinstance(False, float)
True
```
* Python uses 2 bytes for local variable storage in functions. In theory this means that only 65536 variables can be defined in a function. However, python has a handy solution built in that can be used to store more than 2^16 variable names. The following code demonstrates what happens in the stack when more than 65536 local variables are defined (Warning: This code prints around 2^18 lines of text, so be prepared!):
```py ```py
import dis import dis
exec(""" exec("""
def f(): def f():* """ + """
""" + """
""".join(["X"+str(x)+"=" + str(x) for x in range(65539)])) """.join(["X"+str(x)+"=" + str(x) for x in range(65539)]))
f() f()
@ -1233,7 +1242,7 @@ def convert_list_to_string(l, iters):
print(dis.dis(f)) print(dis.dis(f))
``` ```
* List slicing with out of the bound indices. * List slicing with out of the bound indices throws no errors
```py ```py
>>> some_list = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] >>> some_list = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
>>> some_list[111:] >>> some_list[111:]
@ -1279,6 +1288,26 @@ def does_exists_num(l, to_find):
``` ```
Such an `else` clause is also called "completion clause" as reaching the `else` clause in a `try` statement means that the try block actually completed successfully. Such an `else` clause is also called "completion clause" as reaching the `else` clause in a `try` statement means that the try block actually completed successfully.
* String concatenation interpreter optimizations.
```py
>>> a = "some_string"
140420665652016
>>> id(a)
>>> id("some" + "_" + "string") # Notice that both the ids are same.
140420665652016
# using "+", three strings:
>>> timeit.timeit("s1 = s1 + s2 + s3", setup="s1 = ' ' * 100000; s2 = ' ' * 100000; s3 = ' ' * 100000", number=100)
0.25748300552368164
# using "+=", three strings:
>>> timeit.timeit("s1 += s2 + s3", setup="s1 = ' ' * 100000; s2 = ' ' * 100000; s3 = ' ' * 100000", number=100)
0.012188911437988281
```
**Explaination:**
+ `+=` is faster than `+` for concatenating more than two strings because the first string (example, `s1` for `s1 += s2 + s3`) is not destroyed while calculating the complete string.
+ Both the strings refer to the same object because of CPython optimization hat tries to use existing immutable objects in some cases (implementation specific) rather than creating a new object every time. You can read more about this [here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24245324/about-the-changing-id-of-an-immutable-string)
## "Needle in a Haystack" bugs ## "Needle in a Haystack" bugs
This contains some of the potential bugs in you code that are very common but hard to detect. This contains some of the potential bugs in you code that are very common but hard to detect.
@ -1312,6 +1341,8 @@ tuple()
* The correct statement for expected behavior is `t = ('one',)` or `t = 'one',` (missing comma) otherwise the interpreter considers `t` to be a `str` and iterates over it character by character. * The correct statement for expected behavior is `t = ('one',)` or `t = 'one',` (missing comma) otherwise the interpreter considers `t` to be a `str` and iterates over it character by character.
* `()` is a special token and denotes empty `tuple`. * `()` is a special token and denotes empty `tuple`.
### TODO: Collect and add more such examples
# TODO: Hell of an example! # TODO: Hell of an example!
Trying to comeup with an example that combines multiple examples discussed above, making it difficult for the reader to guess the output correctly :sweat_smile:. Trying to comeup with an example that combines multiple examples discussed above, making it difficult for the reader to guess the output correctly :sweat_smile:.