docs/wtfpython
docs/wtfpython
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/satwikkansal/wtfpython synced 2024-11-22 11:04:25 +01:00
Code Releases Activity

Minor exmpample: Correct explanation

Browse Source 
* `'a'[0][0][0][0][0]` is semanically correctly not because
  strings are iterables but because they are sequences as well.

Related to https://github.com/satwikkansal/wtfpython/issues/30
This commit is contained in:
Satwik Kansal 2017-09-06 16:08:42 +05:30
parent 5467a67f0f
commit 24c4a6469e
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
README.md vendored
View File

@ -1630,7 +1630,7 @@ a, b = a[b] = {}, 5
* Few weird looking but semantically correct statements: * Few weird looking but semantically correct statements:
+ `[] = ()` is a semantically correct statement (unpacking an empty `tuple` into an empty `list`) + `[] = ()` is a semantically correct statement (unpacking an empty `tuple` into an empty `list`)
+ `'a'[0][0][0][0][0]` is also a semantically correct statement as strings are iterable in Python. + `'a'[0][0][0][0][0]` is also a semantically correct statement as strings are [sequences](https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-sequence)(iterables supporting element access using integer indices) in Python.
+ `3 --0-- 5 == 8` and `--5 == 5` are both semantically correct statements and evaluate to `True`. + `3 --0-- 5 == 8` and `--5 == 5` are both semantically correct statements and evaluate to `True`.
* Given that `a` is a number, `++a` and `--a` are both valid Python statements, but don't behave the same way as compared with similar statements in languages like C, C++ or Java. * Given that `a` is a number, `++a` and `--a` are both valid Python statements, but don't behave the same way as compared with similar statements in languages like C, C++ or Java.