docs/choosealicense.com
docs/choosealicense.com
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com synced 2024-11-06 11:38:53 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
1,094 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags 5.1 MiB
bba25c9cbb
Commit Graph

1094 Commits

This Branch
This Branch
All Branches
Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Balter
cadadec677 Merge pull request #346 from github/rubocop 
Add Rubocop
 2016-02-09 10:49:28 -05:00
Ben Balter
a35be723a3 exclude vendor directory 2016-02-09 10:44:19 -05:00
Mike Linksvayer
14896c3fc8 style feedback from @benbalter 2016-02-08 14:02:07 -08:00
Ben Balter
91b6c8728e add rubocop 2016-02-08 15:37:19 -05:00
Mike Linksvayer
ade0beec17 Test that only open licenses are included per 
https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md#adding-a-license

- check that all licenses have minimum permissions
- remove non-open (and unused) forbiddens
- closes #1 with confidence
 2016-02-08 10:25:06 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
659c2a0d47 Merge pull request #344 from github/copyleft-tweaks 
Copyleft tweaks
 2016-02-07 11:19:19 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
2a01884f6f make same-license requirement, add to all copyleft licenses 2016-02-05 10:25:19 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
5fb1cde719 remove note about LGPL and OSL, see discussion in #343 2016-02-05 09:15:05 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
b07babb5fc Merge pull request #343 from wking/library-use-permitted 
Remove 'library-usage'
 2016-02-04 12:25:15 -08:00
W. Trevor King
92b2fa9728 Remove 'library-usage' 
The last meaningful change to this tag was c4c48d49 (Change nonstatic
to library usage, 2013-07-10), but I'm not sure where that discussion
happened.  In any case, that commit changed some "must" wording to
"may" wording, which seems like it should move the label from required
to permitted.  However, a library-usage permission would also apply to
many other licenses (e.g. folks are free to link MIT-licensed work
from a proprietary program), and adding library-usage to almost all
the licenses seems like the wrong way to make this distinction [1].

The limitations that the LGPL and OSL place on disclose-source scoping
are already covered in the disclose-source description, so the
library-usage label doesn't seem to be adding anything meaningful.
The OSL gets at this distinction by tightly scoping derivative works
[2], and the LGPL talks about combined works as a special subset of
derivative works [3,4].  The MPL makes a similar distinction between
"Covered Software" and "Larger Work" [5], and the EPL makes a similar
distinction between "derivative works" and "the Program" [6].  Whether
the location of those distinctions, or the requirements placed on
combined works can be neatly summarized in a boolean label remains to
be seen, but we're pretty sure that library-usage is not that label
[7].

Subsequent commits may replace the caveat in the disclose-source
description with wording in the license description themselves or by
adding a new label that summarizes the issue.  Until then, the
disclose-source description more clearly covers the information that
library-usage was intended to convey, so this commit removes the
less-clear label to avoid redundancy.

[1]: https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/pull/343#issuecomment-179532710
[2]: http://rosenlaw.com/OSL3.0-explained.htm#_Toc187293087
[3]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html
[4]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html
[5]: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/
[6]: http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
[7]: https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/pull/343#issuecomment-179557468
 2016-02-04 11:38:05 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
c58e248d9d Merge pull request #342 from github/jekyll3-tests-cleanup 
Fix #341 tests that broke post Jekyll 3 upgrade
 2016-02-03 10:08:16 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
09a17298ab Fix #341 tests that broke post Jekyll 3 upgrade 
- explicitly include jekyll-coffeescript needed per
  http://jekyllrb.com/docs/upgrading/2-to-3/
- option to html-proofer to ignore script embeds; uncertain why
  warnings appeared post upgrade as it doesn't seem that either
  jekyll-seo-tag or html-proofer got new versions in
  https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/pull/339/files but
  suppressed now in any case.
 2016-02-03 09:24:05 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
a058281e66 Merge pull request #340 from github/revert-338-revert-337-update-fields-descriptions 
Revert "Revert "Update descriptions of fields to reflect hidden default change""
 2016-02-02 16:11:26 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
5c020b61eb Revert "Revert "Update descriptions of fields to reflect hidden default change"" 2016-02-02 16:10:39 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
ad63cb8c1b Merge pull request #339 from github/jekyll-3 
upgrade to jekyll 3 due to pages upgrade
 2016-02-02 16:07:16 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
48c6e3e887 upgrade to jekyll 3 due to 
https://github.com/blog/2100-github-pages-now-faster-and-simpler-with-jekyll-3-0
 2016-02-02 16:02:01 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
08cf5180ce Merge pull request #338 from github/revert-337-update-fields-descriptions 
Revert "Update descriptions of fields to reflect hidden default change"
 2016-02-02 14:47:51 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
8c8698f1f5 Revert "Update descriptions of fields to reflect hidden default change" 2016-02-02 14:45:56 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
74c47615e8 Merge pull request #337 from github/update-fields-descriptions 
Update descriptions of fields to reflect hidden default change
 2016-02-02 14:31:58 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
86645a03b3 Update descriptions of fields to reflect hidden default change, 
info provided in
https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/issues/290#issuecomment-138722623
 2016-02-02 13:45:39 -08:00
Brandon Keepers
64c286edd2 Merge pull request #336 from github/new-examples 
Update example projects
 2016-02-01 19:52:04 +01:00
Brandon Keepers
6da34f0825 Use Android instead of Docker 
Reasoning: it is a mass consumer brand that is likely to be better known than Apache
 2016-02-01 19:48:02 +01:00
Brandon Keepers
3227e22d89 Revert changes to GPL text 
This should be iterated on in another PR
 2016-02-01 19:45:01 +01:00
Mike Linksvayer
17fa055cf6 Merge pull request #334 from github/gplv3-no-sublicense 
Remove confusing and inaccurate [no-]sublicensing property
 2016-02-01 09:45:34 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
440b44b5f4 remove all attempt to describe sublicensing permission/prohibitions 2016-01-31 14:56:40 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
53cf00a11f Merge pull request #333 from github/artistic2-copyright 
Artistic License 2.0 (c) is for license text, not a template
 2016-01-31 13:00:10 -08:00
Brandon Keepers
abe74941dc Update examples 
- add a 3rd example (.NET Core) for MIT
- replace SVN & NuGet with more more modern and well-known examples
(Swift, Docker) for Apache:
- Add a GPLv3 project to examples.
 2016-01-31 19:54:59 +01:00
Brandon Keepers
ba251b175a Revert "Update examples" 
This reverts commit 49cf1471f7.
 2016-01-31 19:54:01 +01:00
Brandon Keepers
49cf1471f7 Update examples 
- add a 3rd example (.NET Core) for MIT
- replace SVN & NuGet with more more modern and well-known examples
(Swift, Docker) for Apache:
- Add a GPLv3 project to examples.
 2016-01-31 19:53:09 +01:00
Mike Linksvayer
8522819681 GPLv3 doesn't allow sublicensing, just as AGPLv3 and GPLv2 don't 
LGPLv3 doesn't allow sublicensing, justg as LGPLv2 doesn't as
former is additional permissions for GPLv3 and these don't include
sublicensing
 2016-01-30 10:16:23 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
8ed37bc56a Artistic License 2.0 (c) is for license text, not a template 
fix #310 introduced in 0161a3d75d
 2016-01-30 10:06:05 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
9dbc5190de Merge pull request #332 from pra85/patch-1 
Typo fix in CONTRIBUTING.md
 2016-01-30 09:46:33 -08:00
Prayag Verma
3f6cdaa625 Typo fix in CONTRIBUTING.md 2016-01-30 10:13:53 +05:30
Mike Linksvayer
cee7569a91 Merge pull request #330 from github/bom-test 
Test each license file does not begin with byte order mark
 2016-01-29 09:56:45 -08:00
Ben Balter
41a9f1a9d7 use regex to check for BOM 2016-01-29 12:44:28 -05:00
Ben Balter
b9cdd8cb08 Merge branch 'gh-pages' into bom-test 2016-01-29 12:27:18 -05:00
Mike Linksvayer
d1d7f30b77 Merge pull request #329 from github/no-license-cleanup 
skipping no-license no longer pertinent as no-license is no-more
 2016-01-28 17:33:38 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
6854e8aa86 Test each license file does not begin with byte order mark 
Fixes #328
 2016-01-28 17:19:42 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
0fdcb2ca24 skipping no-license no longer pertinent as no-license is no-more 2016-01-28 15:11:42 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
45c02a892c Merge pull request #325 from github/spdx-name-hint 
Make it clear in the CONTRIBUTING instructions that the license file name should be the SPDX ID
 2016-01-28 14:15:12 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
72cd65abea Merge pull request #326 from github/no-license 
consolidate no license info in /no-license, remove from /licenses
 2016-01-28 14:01:51 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
65b74c5612 Merge pull request #319 from sieversMartin/gh-pages 
Added license lppl-1-3c.txt
 2016-01-28 13:07:19 -08:00
sieversMartin
53324d96cd Merge branch 'gh-pages' into gh-pages 2016-01-28 21:56:33 +01:00
Mike Linksvayer
f99821523d Merge pull request #327 from github/eupl-render 
remove BOM from eupl-1.1.txt which caused it to not render
 2016-01-28 12:14:07 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
96fc8b143e tell html-proofer to check http://choosealicense.com links locally 
rather than externally
 2016-01-28 11:58:58 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
7959b9aca4 remove BOM from eupl-1.1.txt which caused it to not render 2016-01-28 09:23:53 -08:00
Mike Linksvayer
2e261d4530 Merge pull request #320 from EmidioStani/gh-pages 
added eupl-1.1.txt licence
 2016-01-28 09:07:52 -08:00
emidiostani
aa28e590b6 Merge branch 'gh-pages' of https://github.com/EmidioStani/choosealicense.com into gh-pages 2016-01-28 09:11:30 +01:00
emidiostani
c27b9cd238 fixed comment https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/pull/320 2016-01-28 09:10:03 +01:00
Mike Linksvayer
72f852f4eb slim down no license copyright holder info, add section for users 2016-01-27 11:44:30 -08:00