1
0
mirror of https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com synced 2025-01-18 09:27:48 +01:00

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mike Linksvayer
4aa540f154 Add existing project situation, leave 1 permissive, 1 copyleft choice
This is a **draft**, probably will be controversial, definitely needs
wordsmithing.

Fixes #380 "No clear message on why to choose an open source license"
-- added line under heading

Fixes #335 "Feedback from John Sullivan talk on license choosers"
-- remaining items were (roughly) to not surface patents at this
level, and to surface choice between allowing proprirary/closed
source or not

Fixes #239 "Consider discussing ecosystems with an already predominant
license" (well, it doesn't *discuss* but there's a page for that,
unlinked til now) and makes the default recommendation of just about
everyone -- use exisitng project/community's license if applicable
-- prominent on the site

Closes #48 "Proposed modified workflow: make permissive/copyleft
and patents orthogonal" though probably not in way submitter would
favor. I could be convinced that Apache-2.0 should be featured
rather than MIT because of the former's express patent grant, but
as it stands I'm not sure the complexity of Apache-2.0 (and for a
weak grant, relative to GPLv3) is worth it relative to MIT. There's
some value in the first license a user looks at being really easy
to understand. The continued popularity of MIT and simialar ISC and
BSD-2/3 seems to indicate people want that simplicity. And where
are the holdups based on patents supposedly infringed by open source
projects under licenses without an express patent grant that could
not have happened had those projects been under Apache-2.0? Please
educate me! :)

Any and all feedback most welcome.
2016-06-06 18:31:14 -07:00
Mike Linksvayer
baddd740af remove family display elements, add spectrum explanation 2016-04-07 17:49:56 -07:00
Mike Linksvayer
5e41181f25 replace /licenses listings with spectrum
(on home page, non-hidden) -> (agplv3 to unlicense)

no explanation or cruft removal done yet
2016-04-07 16:08:58 -07:00
Mike Linksvayer
e98ec06a7d consolidate no license info in /no-license, remove from /licenses
fixes #196
2016-01-26 13:42:29 -08:00
Ben Balter
915c08b821 move meta and fields to yaml 2015-08-22 15:25:16 -04:00
Ben Balter
4ba1ca5dac implement hidden licenses 2015-08-06 11:56:18 -04:00
Ben Balter
22cc77f12b first pass at jekyll2ification 2014-07-31 12:36:56 -04:00
Aidan Feldman
67e88a39e3 attempt to sort licenses in list 2013-12-18 02:48:49 -05:00
XhmikosR
f5aac12538 licenses.html: Add missing page title. 2013-12-15 13:32:24 +02:00
Jason Long
f28894d905 made partial for license overview sections 2013-11-06 11:24:34 -05:00
Jason Long
246cbc8d65 pill nav for license variations 2013-11-06 10:10:48 -05:00
Jason Long
a9f1de32ae pulled family name and description out of table 2013-11-05 14:22:51 -05:00
Haacked
95d34dc9bd Group licenses together 2013-10-28 16:48:57 -07:00
Jeff King
3298755706 fix capitalization of PERL/artistic license
Perl-ites prefer "Perl" for the language and "perl" for the implementation, but never "PERL" (see `perldoc perlfaq1`).

Text referring to a license as a proper noun reads better with the noun capitalized (e.g., "the Artistic License"), and this form is used by `perldoc artistic`.
2013-06-15 04:56:01 -03:00
Benjamin J. Balter
caa47fb00c First pass at Jekylification
* Move licenses to license template
* Move home / about to page template
* Move annotations to config file, included via annotations.js
* Move license metadata to YML Front matter
* Automate the presentation of license metadata
* Move sidebar to include
* Add _site to gitignore
2013-05-21 15:17:07 -07:00