From a240a1f4e62b69acefcc7c0b46bb2e7ca23800fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Michael=20Vorburger=20=E2=9B=91=EF=B8=8F?= Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:49:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix Code Search link in CONTRIBUTING 2.8M instead of 4 files under MIT license is more like it? ;-) --- CONTRIBUTING.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md index bcdc83f..82cd4ea 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Choosealicense.com is intended to demystify license choices, not present or cata * [List of OSI approved licenses](https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) * [GNU's list of free licenses](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html) (*note: the license must be listed in one of the three "free" categories*) * [Open Definition's list of conformant licenses](https://opendefinition.org/licenses/) (non-code) -3. The license must be used in at least *1,000* public repositories. This may be documented, for example, with a [GitHub code search](https://github.com/search?q=MIT+filename%3ALICENSE&type=Code). +3. The license must be used in at least *1,000* public repositories. This may be documented, for example, with a [GitHub code search](https://github.com/search?q=MIT+path%3ALICENSE&type=Code). 4. 3 notable projects using the license must be identified. These must have straightforward LICENSE files which serve as examples newcomers can follow and that could be detected by [licensee](https://github.com/licensee/licensee) if it knew about the license. If your proposed license meets the above criteria, here's a few other things to keep in mind as you propose the license's addition: