docs/choosealicense.com
docs/choosealicense.com
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com synced 2024-06-16 16:09:50 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Make repository use requirement for adding a license slightly more generic

Browse Source 
Conceivably there could be substantial evidence in public repositories outside GitHub, move GitHub search to eg. Fixes #739
This commit is contained in:
Mike Linksvayer 2020-06-21 15:19:38 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent 2467d15902
commit 14885cff71
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
CONTRIBUTING.md
View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Choosealicense.com is intended to demystify license choices, not present or cata
* [List of OSI approved licenses](https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical)
* [GNU's list of free licenses](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html) (*note: the license must be listed in one of the three "free" categories*)
* [Open Definition's list of conformant licenses](https://opendefinition.org/licenses/) (non-code)
3. A [GitHub code search](https://github.com/search?q=MIT+filename%3ALICENSE&type=Code) must reveal at least *1,000* public repositories using the license.
3. The license must be used in at least *1,000* public repositories. This may be documented, for example, with a [GitHub code search](https://github.com/search?q=MIT+filename%3ALICENSE&type=Code).
4. 3 notable projects using the license must be identified. These must have straightforward LICENSE files which serve as examples newcomers can follow and that could be detected by [licensee](https://github.com/benbalter/licensee) if it knew about the license.
If your proposed license meets the above criteria, here's a few other things to keep in mind as you propose the license's addition: