2012-04-18 22:30:13 +02:00
|
|
|
# Choose a License Web Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like a Choose Your Own Adventure site, but only much less interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Intro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of repositories on GitHub.com don't have a license. GitHub could slap on
|
|
|
|
|
a license chooser, but if you don't know anything about licenses, how are you
|
|
|
|
|
supposed to make an informed decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChooseALicense.com is designed to help people make an informed decision about
|
|
|
|
|
licenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Immediate Goals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Politics Free - Let's just not get into it.
|
|
|
|
|
* Well designed, but that goes without saying.
|
|
|
|
|
* The homepage should have just enough to help 99% of folks make a decision.
|
|
|
|
|
* For the 1%, the site will contain a license chooser similar to
|
|
|
|
|
the [creative commons license chooser](http://creativecommons.org/choose/)
|
2012-04-18 22:41:21 +02:00
|
|
|
* Not comprehensive. Seems like an odd goal, but there are a bajillion
|
|
|
|
|
(I counted) licenses out there. We're going to have to filter that down to a
|
|
|
|
|
small list of those that matter.
|
2012-04-18 22:30:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Design
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think v1 of the site could be a completely static JavaScript site. No need
|
|
|
|
|
for a back end until we actually need it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Community
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We plan to build out the skeleton of the site privately first, but then open
|
|
|
|
|
it up to accept contributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil will look into whether various open source foundations and lawyers would
|
|
|
|
|
be interested in being involved. Probably makes good sense to have a lawyer
|
|
|
|
|
review the content before we post it live.
|
